"state rights" man, and, though opposed to slavery on principle, he cried "Hands off!" to any interference by the general government with the domestic institutions of the states. His speeches read better than most of his contemporaries'. They are interesting in their exhibit of a bitter and eccentric individuality; witty, incisive, and expressed in a pungent and familiar style which contrasts refreshingly with the diplomatic language and glittering generalities of most congressional oratory, whose verbiage seems to keep its subject always at arm's-length.

Another noteworthy writing of Jefferson's was his Inaugural Address of March 4, 1801, with its program of equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the state governments in all their rights; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense; freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected."

. .

During his six years' residence in France, as American minister, Jefferson had become indoctrinated with the principles of French democracy. His main service and that of his party-the Democratic, or, as it was then called, the Republican party-to the young republic was in its insistence upon toleration of all beliefs, and upon the freedom of the individual from all forms of governmental restraint. Jefferson has some claims to rank as an author in general literature. Educated at William and Mary College in the old Virginia capital, Williamsburg, he became the founder of the University of Virginia, in which he made special provision for the study of Anglo-Saxon, and in which the

Jefferson's
Inaugural
Address.

French democracy.

The Univer

sity of Vir

ginia, 1819.

Jefferson's "Notes on Virginia."

Debates on the constitution.

Alexander
Hamilton.

liberal scheme of instruction and discipline was conformed, in theory, at least, to the "university idea." His "Notes on Virginia are not without literary quality, and one description, in particular, has been often quoted-the passage of the Potomac through the Blue Ridge-in which is this poetically imaginative touch: "The mountain being cloven asunder, she presents to your eye, through the cleft, a small catch of smooth blue horizon, at an infinite distance in the plain country, inviting you, as it were, from the riot and tumult roaring around, to pass through the breach and participate of the calm below."

After the conclusion of peace with England, in 1783, political discussion centered about the constitution, which in 1788 took the place of the looser Articles of Confederation adopted in 1778. The constitution as finally ratified was a compromise between two parties-the Federalists, who wanted a strong central government, and the Anti-Federals (afterward called Republicans, or Democrats), who wished to preserve state sovereignty. The debates on the adoption of the constitution, both in the general convention of the states, which met at Philadelphia in 1787, and in the separate state conventions called to ratify its action, form a valuable body of comment and illustration upon the instrument itself. One of the most notable of the speeches in opposition was Patrick Henry's address before the Virginia Convention. "That this is a consolidated government," he said, "is demonstrably clear; and the danger of such a government is, to my mind, very striking." The leader of the Federal party was Alexander Hamilton, the ablest constructive intellect among the statesmen of our revolutionary era, of whom Talleyrand said that he "had never known his equal"; whom Guizot classed with "the men who have best known the vital principles and fundamental conditions of a government worthy of its name and mis

"The Feder

sion." Hamilton's speech "On the Expediency of Adopt-
ing the Federal Constitution," delivered in the Convention
of New York, June 24, 1788, was a masterly statement of
the necessity and advantages of the Union. But the most
complete exposition of the constitutional philosophy of the
Federal party was the series of eighty-five papers entitled
"The Federalist," printed during the years 1787-88, and
mostly in the Independent Journal of New York, over the alist."
signature "Publius." These were the work of Hamilton,
of John Jay, afterward chief-justice, and of James Madi-
son, afterward president of the United States. The "Fed-
eralist" papers, though written in a somewhat ponderous
diction, are among the great landmarks of American his-
tory, and were in themselves a political education to the
generation that read them. Hamilton was a brilliant and
versatile figure, a persuasive orator, a forcible writer, and
as secretary of the treasury under Washington the fore-
most of American financiers. He was killed in a duel by
Aaron Burr, at Weehawken, in 1804.

The Federalists were victorious, and under the provisions of the new constitution George Washington was inaugurated first president of the United States, on March 4, 1789. Washington's writings have been collected by Jared Sparks. They consist of journals, letters, messages, addresses, and public documents, for the most part plain and business-like in manner, and without any literary pretensions. The most elaborate and the best known of them is his "Farewell Address," issued upon his retirement from the presidency in 1796. In the composition "Farewell of this he was assisted by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay. It is wise in substance and dignified, though somewhat stilted in expression. The correspondence of John Adams, second president of the United States, and his Diary, kept from 1755-85, should also be mentioned as

Washington's

Address."

John Adams's
Diary and cor-

respondence.