 | Thomas James Mathias - 1799 - 462 pages
...moved; Lord Raymond and the whole Court declared they would not suffer it to be debated, tahetlier to write against Christianity in general (not concerning...points between the learned, but in general) was not an offence punishable in the temporal Courts of Common, Law. Woolscon was imprisoned one year, and entered... | |
 | Thomas James Mathias - 1803 - 614 pages
...moved ; Lord Raymond and the whole Court declared they would not suffer it to be debated, in/better to write against Christianity in general (not concerning...points between the learned, but in general) was not an offence punishable in the temporal Courts of Common Law. Woolston was imprisoned one year, and entered... | |
 | Thomas James Mathias - 1808 - 682 pages
...when arrest of judgment was moved; Lord Raymond and the whole Court declared they would not sutler it to be debated, -whether to write against Christianity in general (not concerning contro. verted points between the learned, but in general) was not an offence punishable in the temporal... | |
 | 1816 - 748 pages
...convicted on four informations, for hit blasphemous discourses on the miracles of our Saviour, the Court declared they would not suffer it to be debated,...whether to write against Christianity in general, was not an offence punishable in the Temporal courts at common law : it having been settled so to be,... | |
 | Harold Nuttall Tomlins - 1816 - 218 pages
...blasphemous discourses on the miracles of our Saxiour, and attempting to move in arrest of judgment, the Court declared they would not suffer it to be debated whether to write against christianity in general was not an offence punishable in the temporal courts at common law, but they did not intend to include... | |
 | Francis Ludlow Holt - 1816 - 340 pages
...method of proceeding by establishing the new one. • To the first of these points the Court said, that they would not suffer it to be debated whether to write against Christianity in general was not an offence punishable in the temporal courts at common law. They desired it to be taken notice... | |
 | 1817 - 780 pages
...informations for blasphemous aa»courses, den vise; the oairacics of nor Saviour ; ami die court there dechred they would not suffer it to be debated whether to write against ChrKtiamlT in general was not «n offence at c*»mon law punishable in the temporal courts >t having... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, John Herman Merivale - 1819 - 766 pages
...Stra. 834.), for blasphemous discourses, denying the miracles of our Saviour." And there the Court " would not suffer it to be debated whether to write against Christianity in general was not an offence at Common Law, punishable in the Temporal Courts, it having been so settled " in... | |
 | Richard Burn - 1820 - 894 pages
...miracles of our " sfr SJ4 Saviour. And attempting to move in arrest of judgment, the To write a¿ambt court declared they would not suffer it to be debated, whether to Christianity in write against Christianity in general was not an offence punishable general is pu-... | |
 | The Westminster Review.Volume II.July-October,1824 - 1824 - 582 pages
...New Testament, which, in the opinion of Lord Raymond, "struck at the very root of Christianity"; the Court declared *' they would not suffer it to be debated...whether to write against Christianity in general, was not an offence at common law." As this, however, was law made by the Judges, we should not object... | |
| |
Stra. 834. the court would not suffer it to be debated, whether to write against Christianity was punishable in the temporal courts at common law? Wood, therefore, 409. ventures still to vary the phrase, and says " that all blasphemy and profaneness are... 
