nation in which the court was profligate and corrupt, the nobility licentious and treacherous, and the people debased, slavish, and bloodthirsty. Such are the simple and plain facts; such are the grounds upon which we feel ourselves entitled to denounce the charges brought against Nelson in respect to the transactions which took place in the Bay of Naples in the year 1799, as infamous and groundless calumnies. We have confined ourselves to the plainest and simplest statement of facts. Those of our readers who may wish to pursue the subject further, will find a mass of evidence of the most conclusive kind in the appendix to the third volume of Sir Harris Nicolas's Nelson Despatches. This valuable publication has now been before the public for fifteen years, and it is the duty of every one who desires to write or speak truly of the character and acts of Nelson, to make himself acquainted with its contents. Some of our readers will no doubt be surprised to find no allusion to Lady Hamilton in the narrative we have given of these transactions. The simple fact is, that notwithstanding all the obloquy which has been heaped upon her name, she had no share whatever in the trial or execution of Caracciolo, and the only part she took in the affair of the Castles of Uovo and Nuovo consisted in the assistance she gave to Sir William Hamilton in interpreting between Ruffo and Nelson, whose knowledge of the Italian language was very imperfect. Our present limits are far too short to permit us to enter upon the history of one of the most extraordinary women that the world has produced. We reserve this for a future paper. It was long the fashion to palliate what was supposed to be the guilt of Nelson, by urging that he acted under the fatal fascination of Lady Hamilton, and the English language was ransacked for the foulest terms of abuse, which were showered in abundance on her head. Nelson needs no such excuse. He acted as his duty to his country, to her allies, and to himself, required him to do. BETSY BROWN. A TRUE STORY.* ALL must have heard of MRS BROWN, Close to tide-mark in TANGLETOWN, Where brightest sea-nymphs love to dwell: Men fond of fish and frolic dined. And no one, surely, can forget How fishes there of every fin, Strove, in all shapes, our smiles to win; But 'tis not of the fishes there That we would speak-my muse and I; *This story, in all essential points, is, we believe, strictly and literally true; and it will probably be thought by most of our readers that it affords a confirmation of the common saying, that "truth is stranger than fiction." It may perhaps be proper to add, for the sake of some of our readers, that Tangletown has probably taken its name from the abundance on its shore of that kind of sea-weed often called Tangle.-ED. B. M. For them we have no time to spare- Good Mrs Brown had daughters twain-- Were we to say they were not young, BETSY, the eldest-and of her It is that we are now to speakWas, if we do not greatly err, Not of a temper the most meek: This was, perhaps, the reason why She had not brook'd the marriage-tie. But now at last arrived a day, When, after some few perverse years, Our honest Betsy meant to pay The minister all her arrears: For from a neighb'ring town there came A likely fellow was this Jones Six foot and more without his shoes: He looked on Betsy-she on him— It was the oyster-time, and oft To" The Cod's Head" Jones found his way; And there he loved with sawder soft And shell-fish to beguile the day: DANDO himself had hid his head, It no doubt always seem'd most strange And Betsy scarce believes her ears, Her mother in a mark'd tone say, Says Betsy," This is rather late- Still holding to the self-same text : And when the sergeant came next day, He found, to his no small dismay, For Mrs Brown, who "knew her place," What only men like Jones can know : Swift the next morning speeds the news Good Mrs Brown, what could she say? These were the words the mother said: They're Betsy's clothes--what does it mean? And well may some folks now recall Hard things are said of Mrs Brown, For days they search, both far and near, But now a certain SIMON SNIPE A man who might be said to bring Snipe with the little servant-maid Of" The Cod's Head" some converse had; And she, poor SUSAN, sobbing, said, It really oversets me quite- Simon a ghost had never seen But thought, in his peculiar way, Behind the mangle was that bed- But there seem'd something in the air And now, who will believe my tale? Snipe opens wide the press-bed door, And forth there comes, of cheese and ale, Fragrance that bed ne'er knew before; And there is Betsy, safe and soundThere, there she is-the body's found! And what said Betsy? nothing more Yet afterwards 'twas her delight, Years now have pass'd; and many a change And still, when passing by its door, We sometimes feel as if the breeze Upon its waving pinions bore A SOMETHING as of ale and cheese, Still speaking of the old renown Of THE PRESS-BED and BETSY BROWN! A WORD ABOUT TOM JONES. Is there truth, or only a vast exaggeration, in the almost unanimous verdict of modern critics respecting the supreme excellence of Tom Jones, as a work of art? We say, as a work of art, because that is the only ground for serious discussion. Whether the book be, or be not, supremely amusing, is a matter of individual taste, which it would be idle to question; those whom it amuses are amused, and those whom it fails to interest throw it aside, and there's an end of the matter. But it is a fitting subject for inquiry whether the work deserves its reputation as a masterpiece of comic fiction, a model which may be cited to abash the pretensions of succeeding writers, a standard of comparison which is to give law in art. A recent writer has said of it, that "as a work of art it is absolutely perfect." Did he really mean this? He neither explained what were his views of art, nor whether he thought the book imperfect as a novel, but perfect as art; so that the sentence leaves us wholly unenlightened. We are ungracious enough to hold a very different opinion concerning Tom Jones; yet we are so fully aware of the array of eminent authorities which can be cited against us -authorities deserving and receiving our cordial respect-that we should certainly not think of setting up our dictum in opposition; and were the question one purely of taste, we should be silent. But it is not so. Beside the question of taste, there is a question of criticism. Above all individual likings, there are certain definite principles; and criticism is, or ought to be, the application of principles. Before entering on this application, it is right that we should frankly confess that we ourselves long shared, and on more than one occasion |