Natural Right and HistoryUniversity of Chicago Press, 1953 - 326 pages In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss . . . makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves . . . [and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."—John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 22
Page 3
... of the most vocal opponents of natural right do follow from the contemporary rejection of natural right . Our social science may make us very wise or clever as regards the means for any objectives we might choose . INTRODUCTION 3.
... of the most vocal opponents of natural right do follow from the contemporary rejection of natural right . Our social science may make us very wise or clever as regards the means for any objectives we might choose . INTRODUCTION 3.
Page 4
Leo Strauss. regards the means for any objectives we might choose . It ad- mits being unable to help us in discriminating between legiti- mate and illegitimate , between just and unjust , objectives . Such a science is instrumental and ...
Leo Strauss. regards the means for any objectives we might choose . It ad- mits being unable to help us in discriminating between legiti- mate and illegitimate , between just and unjust , objectives . Such a science is instrumental and ...
Page 5
... objectives , it must be traced to the unequal rank of the acts of choosing ; and this means eventually that genuine choice , as distinguished from spurious or despicable choice , is nothing but resolute or deadly serious decision . Such ...
... objectives , it must be traced to the unequal rank of the acts of choosing ; and this means eventually that genuine choice , as distinguished from spurious or despicable choice , is nothing but resolute or deadly serious decision . Such ...
Page 16
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 17
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
absolute according to nature Aristotle Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics basis become best regime Burke chap character Cicero Republic cive civil society classical concerned conflict convention conventionalism Cyropaedia distinction distinguished divine doctrine duty Émile Epicurean Epicurus essentially existence fact finibus freedom French Revolution fundamental genuine happiness hedonism hence historical school historicism historicist Hobbes Hobbes's Hooker human thought Ibid implies individual justice knowledge law of nature legitimate Leviathan Locke Locke's man's natural means merely moral natural law natural law teaching natural right necessarily Nicomachean Ethics notion one's original perfection Plato Republic pleasure political philosophy possible premise presupposes principles problem Protagoras question radical rational reason regard rejection requires Rousseau rule Second Discourse self-preservation sense social order social science Socrates spirit Summa theologica theoretical things Thomas Aquinas tion tradition Treatises truth ture ultimately understanding understood universal value judgments virtue Weber whole wisdom Wissenschaftslehre Xenophon