ANCIENT FRAGMENTS. PHOENICIAN. From Sanchoniatho. CHALDEAN. From Berossus, Abydenus, Megasthenes, Nicholaus Damascenus, Hestiæus, Alexander Polyhistor, Eupolemus, Thallus, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Herodotus, Castor, Velleius Paterculus, Æmilius Sura, Plinius and Cicero. DYNASTIES OF THE KINGS OF CHALDEA, ASSYRIA, MEDIA, PERSIA, THEBES, AND EGYPT. From Abydenus, Africanus, Eusebius, Syncellus, Castor, EGYPTIAN. From the Obelisks, Manetho, Chæremon, Diodorus Siculus, Lysimachus, Polemo, Ptolemæus Mendesius and Artapanus. ORACLES OF Zoroaster. HERMETIC, ORPHIC, PYTHAGOREAN AND TYRRHENIAN. From the ancient and modern Hermetic Books, Horapollo, Chæremon, Orpheus, Hesiodus, Aristophanes, Timotheus, Timæus Locrus, Plato, Amelius, Onomacritus, Ion, Philoponus, Plutarchus, Ocellus, Aristoteles, Suidas and Damascius. CHRONOLOGICAL. From Berossus, Seneca, Censorinus and Theon Alexandrinus. INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. In presenting this collection of ANCIENT FRAGMENTS to the world, some explanation of what is comprehended under that title may not be deemed unnecessary. We are accustomed to regard the Hebrew scriptures, and the Greek and Latin writings, as the only certain records of antiquity: yet there have been other languages, in which have been written the annals and the histories of other nations. Where then are those of Assyria and Babylon, of Persia and Egypt and Phoenicia, of Tyre and Carthage? Of the literature of all these mighty empires, where are even the remains? It will, no doubt, tend to excite some reflections of a melancholy cast, to look on this small volume as an answer. That all such remains are contained in it, I should be unwilling to assert yet, with some diligence and research, I have not been able to increase its size with other fragments, which I could consider sufficiently authenticated. It was my wish to have included in this collection all the fragments of the earlier Gentile world, which have reached us through the me b dium of the Greek language. Of the early historians of Greece the names only of some have come down to us; whilst of others, such as Eupolemus and Histiæus, several very interesting fragments have escaped the general wreck. In the classic ages of their literature, the acquaintance of the Greek historians with antiquity was generally confined and obscure: nor was it till the publication of the Septuagint, that they turned their attention to their own antiquities, and to those of the surrounding nations and for this reason we meet with more certain notices of ancient history in the later, than in the earlier times of Greece. To have drawn a line then; to have inserted the earlier writers in exclusion of the later, would have been to have omitted the more valuable. To have reprinted the fragments of many authors, such as Nicolaus Damascenus, a writer of Damascus, of the Augustan age, would have introduced, with some matter worthy of attention, much of little interest. To have selected from them all, the passages relating to ancient times and foreign states, would have been a task as useless as laborious, and would have swelled the collection to a series of volumes. I have therefore, for the most part, excluded the native Greek historians-and every writer of the Augustan age and downwards-I have also omitted all fragments which bear about them the stamp of forgery, or are the productions of Hellenistic |