Hesiod takes notice of both, but makes the first rather of longer duration. 28 Συνεχέως εμάχοντο δεκα πλειες ενιαυτες. Ten years and more they sternly strove in arms. He in another place speaks of it as a very long and stubborn affair. 29 Δηρον γαρ μάρναντο, πονον θυμαλγε' έχοντες, Year after year in cruel conflict strove In the second engagement the poet informs us, that the Titans were quite discomfited, and ruin ed: and according to the mythology of the Greeks, they were condemned to reside in Tartarus, at the extremities of the known world. According to the Mosaïc account, it happened fourteen years after the conclusion of the first 23 Theog. v. 636. 39 V. 629. Μσχομενων δε αυτών ενιαυτες δέκα ἡ Γη τῳ Δύο έχρησε Thi vini. Apollodorus. 1. 1. p. 4. war. 30 Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer : and in the thirteenth they rebelled. And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer, and the kings that were with him; and smote the Rephaims in Ashteroth Karnaïm, and the Zuzims in Ham, and the Emims in Shaveh Kiriathaim: and the Horites in their mount Seir unto El Paran, which is by the wilderness. And they returned and came to En-Mishpat, which is in Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites, that dwelt in Hazezon Tamar. And there came out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, &c. Josephus, and later writers, do not consider the purport of the scripture account, nor the extent of this war: but speak of it as carried on chiefly, if not solely, with the petty kings of the Asphaltite vale. They bore an inconsiderable part in this grand "affair: and were taken in after a sweep of many, and far more powerful, nations. The former war, when the power of the Titans was first broken, seems to have been a memorable æra with the Cuthites and their descendants, though overlooked by other people. The kings, who composed the confederacy against the Titans, were the king of Elam, the 6. 30 Genesis. c. 14. v. 4, 5, p. 203. king of Elasur, the king of Shinar, and a fourth, styled king of nations. It was a family association against a common enemy, whence we may form a judgment concerning the princes of whom it was composed. Of the king of Shinar we know little: only we may be assured, that he was of the line of Shem; who had recovered the city, over which he ruled, from the Titanians. And we may farther presume, that Tidal king of Nations was no other than the king of Aram. In like manner we may infer, that Arioch Melach Elasur, x, however expressed, was the king of Nineve, called of old, and at this day, "Asur and Assur. In the antient records concerning this war, it is probable, that each nation made itself the principal, and took the chief part of the glory to itself. For the conquests of Ninus (by which word is signified merely the Ninevite) consisted in great measure of these achievements: the whole honour of which the Ninevites and Assyrians appropriated to themselves. The real principal in the war was the king of Elam; as we learn from the Scriptures and another material truth may be 33 33 Zonaras speaks of the war as being carried on by the Assyrians. P. 22. obtained from the account given by Moses; that notwithstanding the boasted conquests of the Assyrians, and the famed empire of Ninus and Semiramis, the province of Assur was a very limited district; and the kingdom of Elam was superior both to that of Nineve, and Babylonia. The king of nations I have supposed to have been the king of Aram: and the nature of the confederacy warrants the supposition. But there are evidences, which shew, that he was no other than the prince of that country and it was called the region of nations, because all Syria, and the country upon the Euphrates consisted of mixed people; which was observable quite down to Galilee in Canaan. Moses Chorenensis wrote the history of Armenia; and he tells us, that when Ninus reigned in 34 Assyria, there was a war carried on against the " Titans of Babylonia, whom he styles the Immortals: and that the king of Aram had the conduct of that war. It is well known, that these kings, after they had defeated those in the vale of Siddim, carried off many prisoners. Among these was Lot, who was afterwards in a wonderful manner rescued by his bro 34 Moses Chorenens. 1. 1. c. 10. p. 27. 35 Bellum Titanium cum Gigantibus-immortalibus ac procerissimis. Ibid. Agmen Titanium. Ibid. 37 ther Abraham. This history is mentioned by Eupolemus; who says, that they were the people of Aram, who had taken him prisoner: and that they had been making war upon the people of Canaan, whom he styles Phenicians. He adds, that upon the news of Lot being a prisoner, Abraham with his armed household alone defeated the enemy, and regained his brother. Diodorus Siculus has a passage very much to the present purpose. He tells us, that " Ninus, or the Ninevite, with the assistance of another prince, made war upon his neighbours the Babylonians. He proceeds afterwards to say, that this formidable expedition was not against the city of Babylon ; for that was not then in being: but against other respectable cities of the country. In this war he with much ease subdued his enemies, and obliged them to pay an annual tribute. How very consonant this history is to the account given by Moses? The author says, that the city Babylon, 36 "Tsepob & Αρμενίας επιτρατευσαι τοις Φοινιξι· Νικησάντων δε και αιχμαλωτισαμένων τον αδελφίδων αυτό (Αβρααμ), τον Αβρααμ μετα οικετων βοηθησαντα εγκρατη γενέσθαι των αιχαλωτισαμένων, κ. το διο Euseb. Præp. Evang. 1. 9. p. 418. n 17 Κατ' εκείνες δε τες χρονες ή μεν νυν ώσα Βαβυλων εκ ην εκτισμένη κατά δε την Βαβυλωνιαν ύπηρχον αλλαι πόλεις αξιολογοι ραδίως δε χειρωσαμενος τους εγχωρίας-τάτοις μεν έταξε τελειν κατ' ενιαυτον ώριστα pers Popes. Diodor. 1. 2. p. 90. |