 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 pages
...applying to count No. 2 apply also to this one. and the question of liability under the contract was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. As to count No. 4. This raises a different question than that in counts 2, 3, 5 and 6. It is a claim... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, James Dowling, Archer Ryland - 1825 - 866 pages
...after the tithe has been set out, for the tithe-owner to compare his tenth part with the residue, is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the judge. Facey v. Hurdon, 5 G. 4. Page 68 TRESPASS. See APPEAL, 1. — JUSTICES, 1.3. — PLEADING, 5.... | |
 | Francis King Eagle, Edward Younge - 1826 - 534 pages
...after the tithe has been set out, for the tithe-owner to compare his tenth part with the residue, is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the judge.— 5 G. 4. BR Facey v. Hurdom. iii. 1 1 72 CATTLE.— Sec ACISTMENT. 1. Where the plaintiff... | |
 | 1851 - 670 pages
...concurred. Order of Sessions quashed. [CROWN CASE RESERVED.] THE QUEEN V. DAVIS.* 1851. > il 26. > April Indictment — Name of Prosecutor — Rule idem Sonans....Trius C, — Held, that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court, whether the two words were idem son an ti a. The following... | |
 | Samuel Niles Sweet - 1843 - 324 pages
...with them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent ; thus , " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court resume the responsibility of deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and... | |
 | Samuel Niles Sweet - 1846 - 340 pages
...they with them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent; thus, " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court assume the responsibility o/"deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1895 - 894 pages
...business ; whether it was leased by him for the company , or for his own private purposes, were questions of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. * * * Whether the use of a barge fell within the scope of the business operations and its mode of conducting them, was... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 614 pages
...was not in the line of official duty. (2.) Whether paid into the Treasury of the State or not was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court ; and the Court erred in regarding it as a question of law alone, and charging upon it as such. 6.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1906 - 796 pages
...whether the plaintiff was justified in assuming that the car had stopped for her to alight was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. This presents the sole question for determination. The ordinance requires that cars shall be stopped... | |
| |
... a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. 
