« PreviousContinue »
THE TWENTIETH DYNASTY.
For some years after the death of Mer-en-Ptah Egypt was in a state of anarchy, "each man did as he pleased, and there was no one who had authority over his fellows. The Land of Egypt was under chiefs of nomes and each fought against ”
@ arose among them and succeeded in diverting the tribute to himself and finally in making himself master of the land. Rest and peace were not restored to Egypt, however, until the gods set their son Set-Necht upon the throne, who very shortly after associated his son Rameses III. with him in the rule of the kingdom. On the death of Set-Necht Rameses III. reigned alone, and having established the worship of the gods in the temples, and restored the customary offerings, in the eighth year he set out with his
troops for the north-eastern borders of his country to do battle Egyptians against the allied forces of the Māshuash, Leku, Shekelasha defeat the and other Asiatic peoples, who had come to the land of the nations. Amorites partly by land and partly by sea; the Egyptians
were victorious and inflicted a crushing defeat on the enemy.
About this time he seems to have carried on some small wars Expedition in Nubia. In addition to his wars, he fitted out and despatched to Punt,
an expedition to Punt, which returned safely, bringing many
mines in the Sinaitic Peninsula, and the copper mines in the
same place he built what has been generally called his "palace," and a magnificent temple to Amen-Rā. The “palace” consisted of two square towers, the four sides of which were symmetrically inclined to a common centre. The interior chambers were ornamented with sculptures, on which were depicted scenes in the domestic (?) life of the king. The temple at Medînet Habû is of remarkable interest, and on the Medinet
Habû walls are sculptured battle scenes on land and sea, in which Rameses is victorious over his enemies. Near Karnak he Karnak. built a temple to Ptah, and he added buildings to the temple of Amen-Rā there; he began to build the temple of Chonsu, and it would seem that he repaired many of the temples and shrines set up both at Karnak and Luxor. The most important document for the history of the reign of this king is the famous Harris Papyrus No. 1, now preserved in the Harris British Museum. It was found in a box, in a rough-hewn
Papyrus. rock chamber in the earth, near Medînet Haba. This papyrus enumerates the gifts which he made to the gods of Thebes, Heliopolis and Memphis, and concludes with a statement of the principal events of his reign. This wonderful papyrus, which measures 135 feet by 17 inches, was published in facsimile by the Trustees of the British Museum, with an introduction and translation by Dr. Birch.
Of Rameses IV. little is known beyond the fact that he 1166-1133 carried on the works in the mines in the valley of Hammâmât with great diligence ; he was succeeded by Rameses V., of whom also very little is known. Of Rameses VI., the most important remains are his tomb in Bibân el-Mulûk; on the walls the risings of various stars are given and much astro- Astronomical information. This tomb was originally made for nomical
tables at Rameses V. Rameses VII. and Rameses VIII. were the Thebes. next rulers of Egypt; the most important event in the reign of Rameses IX. was the attempt to break into and rob the royal tombs at Thebes in his sixteenth year. The robbers were caught and prosecuted by the government, and after an official examination of the tombs had been made by the chief officers of the city, to find out exactly what Robberyof damage had been done, the band of thieves were properly royal
. punished. The robbery had gone on for some years, and
appears to have been continued in the nineteenth year of
him. Each chief brought his offering of gold, etc., but the Princess of chief of Bechten brought his eldest daughter, who was a most Bechten.
beautiful girl, and gave her to the king. She found favour in
THE TWENTY-FIRST DYNASTY. With the death of Rameses XIII. a new period of dis- "Priestorder came over the government of Egypt, and for nearly one
kings" rule hundred years there seems to have been no legal king seated Egypt. on the throne. The chief priest of Àmen called Her-Heruse-Amen had little by little gathered the power of a king into his own hand, and finally he declared himself “King of Upper and Lower Egypt,” and thus became the first of the so-called "priest-kings" of the XXIst dynasty. His dwelling- 1100-1000 place was Thebes, and the buildings which he carried out there, instead of being inscribed with the records of glorious victories over the foes of Egypt, were decorated with inscriptions of a purely religious character. The tribes that were subject to Egypt, and were at that moment unprepared for war, paid their tribute to him as the successor of the Pharaohs, but it was not to be expected that a ruler who devoted more time to the service of Amen than to war, could maintain his sovereignty over restless and warlike peoples like the Cheta, or Retennu, of whom he calls himself the conqueror. During his reign the mummies and coffins and funereal furniture of some of the kings of the XVIIth, XVIIIth and XIXth dynasties were brought from their tombs and deposited together in one place, now called in Arabic Dêr el-bahari, Dêr el. where they were discovered by an Arab in 1871. For the
Mummies. account of the recovery of these by Brugsch-Bey and Maspero, see Maspero, Les Momies Royales de Déir el Bahari, fasc. I, tom. IV., of the Mémoires of the French Archæological Mission at Cairo.
Her-Heru was succeeded by his grandson, Pi-net'em I., the son of Pi-ānchi, the high-priest of Amen, the husband of Maāt ka-Ra, a princess who belonged to the old line of kings; Pi-net'em II. married the royal daughter and royal wife Het-Hert-ḥent-taui, but appears never to have been actually king Wiedemann doubts the existence of this king.' Of Paseb-chā-nut, Men-cheper-Rā and his son Pi. netem III. but little is known; they were succeeded by Paseb-chā-nut II., during whose reign Solomon captured
· Aeg. Geschichte, p. 536. B. M.
Solomon the town of Gezer, and having conquered the Canaanites becomes king of
there, became king of Palestine. It is thought by some that Palestine. his Egyptian wife was the daughter of one of the kings of the
XXIst dynasty. The history of this period is very uncertain, and definite conclusions respecting it cannot be arrived at without fuller information.
THE TWENTY-SECOND DYNASTY.
Various theories have been propounded concerning the of kings of origin of the kings of this dynasty; the father of its first king XXIInd Shashanq I. was called Nemart, a name which has been dynasty.
identified with that of Nimrod. From the fact that the names Usarken, Thekeleth, common to several of its kings, resemble the Assyrian and Babylonian names Sarginu, “Sargon,” and Tukulti, “Tiglath,” it has been generally assumed that they sprang either from a purely Semitic race in Mesopotamia itself, or from Semites who had been settled in the Delta for a considerable time. That they were of foreign extraction is certain, because the determinative placed at the end of their names is that of a man from a foreign country hit and the people called Mā, of whom Nemart styles himself the prince, have been proved by De Rougé to
be simply the Māshuasha. 966-800 Shashanq I., the Shishak (700) of the Bible, the pro
tector of Jeroboam, who lifted up his hand against Solomon Conquest (1 Kings xi. 26), led an expedition against Rehoboam, king of Pales.
of Judah, and took away from Jerusalem “the treasures of tine and capture of the house of the Lord, and the treasures of the king's house, Jerusalem. he even took away all: and he took away all the shields of
gold which Solomon had made.” (1 Kings xiv. 25, 26.) The list of the cities and districts, about 138 in number, captured by Shashanq during this war is inscribed upon the south wall of the temple of Amen-Rā at Karnak The wife of Shashang was called Kerāmā, and their son Åauput. Of the acts of Usarken (Sargon) I., Thekeleth (Tiglath) I., Usarken II., and Shashanq II. but little is known, and the
| De Rougé, Mélanges d'Archéologie, t. 1, p. 87.