« PreviousContinue »
every good resolution, and assisted ner-stone, the building fitly framed ! in every pious effort that our souls together may grow unto an holy temand bodies may daily become holier ple in the Lord, and that thus may and yet more boly temples for the we be builded together for an habiSpirit that dwelleth in them-and tation of God through Jesus Christ. that Jesus Christ, being the chief cor
To the Editor of the Remembrancer. been allegorizing the eighth verse,
he would have been led to speak of SIR,
the three persons of the Trinity in The next general accusation, which an order different from that which I have to urge against the espousers he has actually followed; there will of the disputed passage, is, that in be no room for the least exception all their attempts to confirm its au- of this kind, if we allow him only thenticity, they constantly take re to have construed his Greek, in the fuge in those intrenchments which manner in which, I think he must have been already demolished and have construed it; and in which, I completely thrown down. This strenuously maintain, it ought to be is observable wherever I cast my construed at this day. For there eye. In the long extract, which are three who bear testimony, as to is brought from Ittigius by the the spirit, the water, and the blood ; bishop of St. David's, for the pur- and the three are for one. Here pose of setting aside in St. Cyprian the three baptismal witnesses of the allegorical interpretation of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are eighth verse; as well for disproving suggested to the mind of the Aposthe assertion of Simon, that before tle by the occurrence of the water, the times of Victor, Vitensis, and and the blood, and the spirit, in the Fulgentius, no Christian Father had preceding verses; and, though from ever cited this verse of St. John; the superior dignity of its uature, we find nothing further advanced, the spirit, either by John himself, by way of argument, than the old or by some later hand, is made to controverted testimony of St. Cy- take the precedence of the water prian again; and some trivial objec- and the blood ; yet was St. Cyprian tions to the mode of expounding naturally right in following the order that father, as adopted by Facun- of the baptismal formula, even on dus. Now the testimony of St. the supposition, that in his copy of Cyprian, as I have previously re the epistle, the term, spirit, stood marked, extends no farther than to the first in order, as it does with the words, Tres unum sunt; words us; and not the last, as in some which, according to the Latin version authorities which I have noticed. itself, are as much a part of the To the above extremely weak and eighth as they are of the seventh highly unsatisfactory arguments of verse; and which that father would Ittigius I must subjoin the subsenever have quoted alone by them- quent paragraph, as copied into the selves, had there been in his text Remembrancer from the bishop of any express mention of the persons, St. David's. Father, Word, and Spirit, as they • The whole of the external ar. now stand in the interpolation. But gument from the absence of the as to the frivolous objection started verse in the Greek manuscripts, by Ittigius, that, if Cyprian had and from the silence of the Greek
Fathers, will avail nothing, if it to be found neither in the Greek can be proved, that the verse was original, nor in any of those ancient ever extant in the most ancient versions, which had been severally Greek copies of the original epistle and independently made from the of St. Joho. That it was so extant, very oldest of the Greek manuMill, Bengelius, and others affirm scripts; if they had been influenced on the authority of the Latin ver- by Christian sobriety and modesty, sion, and the the express citation they would either have discarded of the verse by Cyprian.'
the interpolation altogether; or, at Here the projected proof of the least, have inserted it in the text verse having been once extant in the with some accompanying mark of most ancient Greek copies of the suspicion and doubtfulness. But, epistle of St. John, dwindles into the if such be the case, then the pasperemptory affirmation of Mill, Ben- sage in question has little or no gelius, and others, that it was so, on more right to be in the Vulgate the authority of the Vulgate, and than in any other authorized version the testimony of St. Cyprian. It of the New Testament; how, I has always been to me matter of the would ask, can we argue with Mill, most painful regret to see so many Bengelias, and the Bishop of St. of our first champions, in the field David's, that, because on the first of eriticism, bringing their very pro- impression of the Vulgate it was fession into disrepute and con- actually existing in many of the tempt, by an obstinate perseverance Latin manuscripts; therefore, it in maintaining what cannot possibly must needs have been in the Greek be maintained, without renouncing original, from which the Vulgate at the same time those fundamental was first made? The acknowledged principles, on which all sober criti. and incontrovertible fact, that many cism is of necessity established. To of the very oldest of the Latin masuch scholars as Mill and Bengelius nuscripts contained it not, dashes it could not have been unknown; this argument head and tail to the and to my lord of St. David's, I am ground. To retain and to propa. sure it must be perfectly known, gate the Heavenly Witnesses, when that, though by the decision of the once clandestinely inserted, there Council of Trent the seventh verse would naturally arise in the mind of is now become a canonical part of the transcriber a pious and zealous the Latin version; yet, before the wish; and, I may also add, a certain invention of printing, many of the religious scruple, lest by wilfully most ancient and valuable of the discarding so striking a mention of Latin manuscripts did not contain the three persons of the Godhead, the interpolation : and that, if the he should be incurring some guilt; first printers of the Latin version as but for the deliberate and wanton well as of the Greek original bad omission of the whole verse in copydealt uprightly and fairly with the ing from one manuscript into anoChristian world, the passage of the ther, and that too in an age and Heavenly Witnesses would have been part of Christendom in which the consigned to oblivion long before sacred doctrine of the ever blessed the commencement of the nineteenth Tripity was held in such sovereign century. For the Latin editors, esteem, there could be no possible indeed, there was some excuse; as 'motive whatever; and, if not wilfully the major part of their then existing and purposely omitted, then it must manuscripts, probably contained have been equally wanted in those the passage: nevertheless, when still older manuscripts from which they saw, that even their own ma- the new transcripts were made. buscripts differed; and above all, There are some statements by the when they considered, that it was Bishop of St. David's, which I am
somewhat at a loss to comprehend; obtained from a further search into such as, that during the first three the uncollected manuscripts; and centuries there is no external evidence that there will soon be little or no against the verse; and, that for the occasion to doubt of its authen-, first fifteen centuries of the Christian ticity. But, I would ask, have not Church, during all the controversies these Heavenly Witnesses been a of the conflicting parties, no sus most interesting question amongst picion was ever raised of corruption the learned ever since the age of or interpolation in the Latin version Erasmus? During this long inter. of this passage.
Now this, if I val, has not every sacred critic and rightly comprehend it, goes to the antiquarian, catholic as well as length, first, of assuming, that the protestant, whenever an old manupassage in dispute, generally speak- script containing the epistle fell in ing, was in all the Latin copies from his way, had the cnriosity to exthe very first promulgation of the amine, whether it contained the Christian code; and, then, of infer- disputed passage or not? And is ring, that, if it had not been a it probable, that if any thing further genuine text, it would have been could have been alleged from ancient openly opposed by the Fathers of manuscripts towards establishing its the first ages.
But that the verse authenticity, so welcome a discovery ever found its way at all into any would have been so long concealed of the Latin manuscripts till the be from the Christian world ? So far ginuing of the eighth century, is a then, from cherishing any hope, supposition which I stoutly deny; that the evidence for it may yet derive and which I have already confuted some accession of strength from with arguments that I should be future researches; I
very happy to see disproved, before any contrary ; that, as nothing hitherto, such assumption as that of my lord after so long an interval, has been of St. David's can be suffered to found; so nothing in future will be obtain. How, in the name of com. found, to save it from that sentence mon sense, could the Fathers, in of condemnation to which it has their several disputations, have ob. been so generally and so justly con, jected to the genuineness of the signed. passage, if the passage was never There ought not, surely, to be produced ; and how could it ever any stress laid on the circumstance, be produced, if it was not in the that in the Syriac version the eighth Epistle? Surely that is a most un verse is connected by a copulative pardonable way of vindicating the conjunction. For admitting this Heavenly Witnesses, to assume always to have been the case, the contrary to the clearest evidence, Syriac copulative, like the Hebrew that the verse always had a place and the Æthiopic, is of too various in the Latin canon; and then again and uncertain application to authoto deduce from the silence of the rize any weighty inference from it, Fathers, another argument for its in a matter of verbal criticism. If genuineness; when it is that very the statement which I have trans. general and universal silence of the lated from the Armenian editor in primitive Fathers, which more es. a preceding communication, be pecially militates against its authen- precisely correct, and worthy of ticity, and condemus it for an inter- being strictly relied upon; neither polation.
the Syriac, nor the Arabic, nor the Nearly allied to the above sha: Armenian version, according to the dows of argument is that delusive copies which were lying before him, hope, with which the supporters of bad any conjunction at all. In the the passage still cherish the thought, Coptic version, certainly, we have that additional evidence may be yet the causal conjunction only, as in
the Greek and the Latin; and, garding the spirit, the water, and whether we insist on retaining the the blood, as having afforded the Syriac copulative or not, seeing that occasion of the testimony being it may signify, for, as well as, and; given, but not as having given the affects not the question about the testimony themselves; I keep clear Heavenly Witnesses.
of that most unintelligible and inexI have perused what Epiphanius plicable theology of the water and says concerning the Alogi, and the blood bearing any kind of actual come to the same conclusion with testimony to the divine mission of my lord of St. David's; that these Christ. The Spirit of God, indeed, Alogi rejected all the writings of from the diversity of its forms and St. John; not that they despised operations, can either afford the the authority of St. John, but occasion of divine testimony being because they denied, that he had given; or can give it itself : and in ever written any such books. I both these ways it was subservient eannot, however, hence collect any to the Messias. For when it deconfirmation; but rather a confuta- scended in a bodily shape, and untion of the Heavenly Witnesses. der the form of a dove alighted For, if they rejected the whole of upon his head, it did not thereby of the Apocalypse on account of the itself afford any actual testimony, solitary instance in which the term that Jesus was the Christ; but it Word, is once applied to Christ; immediately gave occasion to testiwell might they reject the first mony being given by John the Epistle; since, in the very opening Baptist ; and from that moment the of it, Christ is expressly denomi. Holy Ghost began to bear public Dated the Word of Life. Besides, testimony to the divine mission of if the disputed passage had been our Lord in the miracles which he actually at that time in the Epistle wrought. I need scarcely add, that, of St. John, and liad occasioned, as as I restrict the water to that parit must have done, offence to these ticular water of his Baptism, and Alogi; it is something more than the blood to that particular blood probable, that Epiphanius would which he shed upon the cross; so bave adverted to the circumstance, the Spirit in this verse 1 restrict to and have left some remarks on the that visible and bodily appearance
of the Spirit which alighted and I perfectly accord, however, with rested upon him, when he was bapbis lordship in the justness and ac. tized in the Jordan. curacy of his grammatical strictures Though, I think, I have already in reply to Dr. Pye Smith. The replied to every thing in the ReGreek original of the eighth verse membrancer, which meets the eye, appears to me to have been mis. under the shape of an argument; understood and misconstrued from yet as there is an erroneous attempt the very first; and, by being mis. to support the interpolation from translated into other tongues, neces the testimony of the Rabbinical sarily caused such doubt and per- school, I shall just consider, what plexity, that the Fathers in general that testimony is. It seems, then, were unwilling to meddle with it; that Mr. Nolan and Dr. Hales and, when they did take notice of recite from the most ancient Rabit, were totally at a loss what to do binical Books the phrase, The three with it. The exceptions, however, are one; with its Rabbinical expowbich his lordship has drawn toge- sitiou. There are three ones, and lo! ther from a consideration of the they are one ; which, it is thought context, apply not to the manner not only furnishes the identical in which I construe the eighth clausule of the seventh verse; but verse; and what is more, by re- points to the source from which the
Apostle had derived it. Now ad
The remarks of your corresponmitting, that Mr. Nolan and Dr. dent T. M. as well as those of any Hales know something of what other objector to the truth of my they are here descanting upon; and positions shall be honoured with a that they are not, like the common reply. herd of authors, making a borrowed In the interim, display of their Rabbinical learning
I remain, &c. at the third, or the fourth, or, per
Your obedient Servant, haps, the fifth hand; what is there
John OXLEE, in that cabalistic phraseology, I
Rector of Scawton. pray, which does not apply to the Stonegrave Parsonage, clausule of the eighth verse equally
March 15th. with that of the seventh ? I probably have read more Jewish literature of this complexion, than Mr. Nolan and Dr. Hales, put both To the Editor of the Remembrancer. together, ever saw with their eyes ;
Sir, but I do not remember having any The only thing of which I have to where met with the precise phrase, complain in both the letters of your The three are one; though I readily correspondent, T. M. is the infegrant, that, in my volumes on the rence which he has proceeded to Doctrines of the 'Trinity and Incar- draw from one of my concessions nation, I have produced expressions, in favour of the heavenly witnesses. which, in reference to the three per- I certainly have said amongst other sons of the Godhead, amount to the things, that, if the advocates of the same thing. The phrase, The ten disputed verse could point out to are one, is much more likely to me any one autbentic and imporoccur in a cabalistic author than tant passage of the New Testament, the precise phrase, The three are which had been equally passed over one; as stated in the Remem. in silence by all the Greek and brancer. The chief complaint, Latin Fathers, I would admit, not, however, is, that the seventh verse as T. M. has made me speak, the derives no more confirmation than authenticity of the verse; but the the eighth from this Rabbinical illus- reasonableness of allowing it to retration.
main in the sacred canon, on the I have now to thank you, Mr. simple ground, that it might possiEditor, for the wanly candour with bly have been, at one time, in the which you have given such ready Greek and other texts, though admission to the insertion of my afterwards not to be found. In papers. Indeed the chief delicacy this I am met by your corresponwhich I felt in stepping forward on dent, T. M. who tells me, that there this occasion, was, lest I should be is the twentieth verse of the very appearing to thwart the noble efforts same chapter, containing a clause of that illustrious ornament of the of great importance in the many English episcopate, the present controversies respecting the divinity Bishop of St. David's, against the of Christ, during the second and venom of the Unitarians. But since third centuries ; and yet it was never it is the duty of every Chrstian quoted by any of the Ante-Nicene Priest to reject an interpolation no Fathers. That there is, likewise, less than to defend the genuine 1 Tim. ïii. 16. of which Sir Isaac text; that great and learned prelate, Newton, speaking of the writers of for whom I feel both veneration and the first five centuries, affirms, that gratitude, will, I am sure, be the in all their discourses to prove the Hirst to give me credit for the sin. deity of the Son, they never allege cerity of my motives.