 ... accused or the trial counsel for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity of challenges for cause, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one person at a time.  A Manual for Courts-martial - Page 103by United States. War Department - 1920 - 806 pagesFull view - About this book
 | United States. War Department - 1920 - 526 pages
...advocate for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. Challenges by the trial judge advocate shall ordinarily be presented and decided before those by the... | |
 | Royal College of Surgeons of England - 1874 - 782 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. ABT. 89. When a prisoner, arraigned before a general court-martial, from obstinacy and deliberate design,... | |
 | Rollin Augustus Ives - 1879 - 514 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. ART. 89. — When a prisoner, arraigned before a Prisoner general court-martial, from obstinacy and... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate - 1879 - 996 pages
...determine the relevancy and validity thereof, the challenged member retiring until euch decision is made, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. ARTICLE 2(i. When a prisoner, arraigned before a court-martial, from obstinacy anil deliberate design... | |
 | United States. Army. Judge Advocate General's Department, William Winthrop - 1880 - 638 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time." 1. This Article authorizes the exercise of the right of challenge before all courts except field officers'... | |
 | United States. War Department - 1881 - 1396 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. Art. of war 71. In re Bird, 2 Sawyer, 33. PRISONER STANDING MUTE. ART. 89. When a prisoner, arraigned... | |
 | United States. War Department - 1881 - 536 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. Art. of war 71. In re Bird, 2 Sawyer, 33. PRISONER STANDING MUTE. ART. 89. When a prisoner, arraigned... | |
 | United States. War Department - 1889 - 304 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court. The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof, and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time. ART. s9. When a prisoner, arraigned before a general court-martial, from obstinacy and deliberate design,... | |
 | 1902 - 832 pages
...but only for cause stated to the court The court shall determine the relevancy and validity thereof and shall not receive a challenge to more than one member at a time." The acts of congress make no provision for a challenge to the array, and point out no method whereby... | |
| |
