« PreviousContinue »
lications, tre still very few; and that the far greater part of what to possess is more for personal and private use than domestic. Even in the deservedly popular volume of Jenks, there are only family prayers for one week; the rest are all for individual service,
But whatever might have been the Author's own opinion of the expediency or necessity of such a work as this—in order to furnish a greater abundance. or to accommodate a difference of tastes, or to excite attention by new:1e6s, or to cdify more by brevity and simplicity-he can truly aver, that he was principally induced to undertake it at the request of many, urged for years with importunity.
In complying with their desires, he still fears he shall not satisfy their wishes He unquestionably has not satisfied his own. In the want of that leisure which allows a man to throw his whole soul into the composition of his work, and then to employ all his skill in correcting and completing it, he has dono in a few months, at the intervals of much public duty and interruption, what he could. Should the effort obtain acceptance, he shall consider it the greatest honor that could have been conferred upon him, that the service of God should ever be performed in words which he has furnished so imperfectly.
He can reckon on some esteemed connexions, whose partiality, as it has often admitted him into their circles as a friend, and employed him at their do. mestic altar as an expositor and intercessor, will retain him as an assistant, in this volume; and thus while absent in body, he will be present with them in spirit. He is also blessed with children, who will not neglect a practice, to which in the order of a happy family they were so early accus-omed, and which was never rendered irksome by tediousness; and they will-.yes, he knows they will-train up their children in the same holy and lovely usage. And should relationship and endearment serve to render the boc k the more valued and [seful, as a sacred bequest to his descendants, this song would keep him fren thinking he had abored in vain.
PERCY.PL 40% dosih 1820
Tog Author begs leave to offer a few words on the execution of the work itself here submitted to public attention.
Family prayers ought to be short, especially where reading the Sc; ipture makes a part of the service-and it ought always to make a part. Hence the prayers for the week-days may be read in five or six minutes; those :or the Sabbath are commonly a little longer, as families have then more leisure, and are more united; those for particular occasions, as they rarely return, and the events are remarkable, are the longest of all.
A prayer is distinguishable from the repetition of a creed, or the annunci. ation of a system of theology; how much more from the sparring and reficc. tions of controversy! A tincture of the Author's own particular sentiments was hardly avoidable; but he has sought after nothing that would be offen. sive to Christians who differ from him. And as religious persons accord much more when kneeling than sitting, he ventures to think no one will be unable to join in these forms, who believes in the fall of man, the redemption of tho cross, justification by faith, tne necessity of divine influence, and of that ho. liness without which we cannot see the Lord. The Author braves the sus picion of those who are illiberal enough to guage a man's orthodoxy by th. use of an invariable doxology, in the language too which man's wisdom teach eth. Not that he thinks it wrong to close a prayer with a scriptural mean. ing in human terms; but he prefers the words which the Holy Ghost useth; and where they afford a diversity, why should we be afraid to avail ourselves of it? In this respect the sacred writers would not bear the ordeal of some sys tem-critics.
The Author thinks no one can blame him for using so much of the langnage of the Scripture; there is a sacredness in it, and it is well known; much of in too has been used devotionally, and contains the adorations, confessions, suppli. cations, and thanksgivings, uttered by men of God before us, while kneeling at a throne of grace.
Besides being scriptural, he has endeavored to be very plain and simple in the diction. There is a great difference between addressing men and addres sing God. The least artificial mode of uttering our thoughts in prayer is the best. Prayer admits of no brilliancies; every studied ornament it rejects with disdain. He who feeis interested in prayer wili forget all critical and elaborate phraseology. And it is an infelicity to be deplored rather than an excellency to be admired, when ingenuity of thought or surprisingness of expression catches and keeps off the attention trom devotion. Thero are young
divines why not only err in preaching, by substituting finery for elegan:e, and the affectation of art for the eloquence of feeling; but in their derotional exercises too, showing off their tawdrinesses, even in the presence of God, and praying in a strained, aflated style, unintelligible to the ignorant, lamen. ted by the pious, and contemned by the wise. The greatest men have always been distinguished by the plainness and simplicity of their devotional lan. guage. What a difference is there between the other compositions of John.
nd his prayers! No hard word, no elaborate sentence, no classical, no metaphorical allusion, is to be found in any of the few forms of devotion which he has lest us. The same excellency pervades the Liturgy. And it is worthy of remark, that in no prayer recorded in the Bible, is any figure employed unless as fanuliar as the literal expression.
This however does not forbid the use of sentences not directly of the nature of petition. Prayer is designed not cnly as an homage to God, but as a moral exercise to affect ourselves; and to accomplish this purpose we must bo informed or reminded. What therefore tends to make us feel the things wo imploie, is not to be considered, as some call it, a preaching or talking in prayer. Read all the prayers given us in the Scripture: there is not one of them which does not contain expressions of enlargement, not immediately petitionary, yet conducive to the design,
With regard to appropriateness, Jerks has observed, “That we may as well expect to find a shoe that will fit every foot, as a form of prayer to suit every purpose.” Family prayers must be necessarily general, na adapted to the state of a household, devoid of its peculiarities. No form ca: be made to include every particular circumstance or occurrence; the very things that would ren. der it suitable to one family, would even hinder the use of it by another. The Author fears whether in a few instances he has not forgotten this.
Yet events and circumstances are perpetually arising, and it is of great im. portance to notice them devotionally Almost every prayer recorded in the Scriptures arose out of particular occurrences, and was designed to improve them. Here is a difficulty which there is only ono way of removing. It is by adding some short addresses applicable to certain events and circunstances, and whicn the reader may insert in their proper place in the prayer, or use at the end of it. Many of these, therefore, the Author has supplied in the close of the volume. Many more might have been added, had the prayers been designed for persunnd and prirale use.
In severity forms of the same kind, it was not easy to maintain so much diversity as some would wish. Famıly devotion in itself admits of less va. riety than either private or públic worship. But though similarity will be sometimes found, sameness, he believes, with a very few trifling exceptions, has been avoided. l'his does not extend however to the repetition of the same scrip ture sentences.
l'he Author nas felt what a difference there is between offering and writ. ing a prayer; vut he endeavored as much as possible when he retired to com. pose, to place himself by thought in the situation of perfor:nance; and foi. lowed the same mode in writing which he has always found he best in pray. ing, to exclude formality and to gain variety-to yield to the present feeling of the mind, whether it leads to indulge principally in confession or in thanksgiving, petition, or intercession.
Some thin;s must be always expressed; others can only be admitted occa. wionally. Yn theso shoull not be forgotten, Cases of affliction; the stars
of pub ic affairs; the nation; the cause of God in the world: these and other things, though not particularized in every exercise, must be noticed so frequently as to keep the mind alive to them.
With regard to the prayers for particular occasions-such as pertain to Jays of mourning, fasting, or thanksgiving; and those which respect the begin. ning and end of the year-will draw forth no objection. But as to those which regard religious festivals, some will probably condemn the Author on the ground of consistency. On that ground he is willing to be tried. Con. sistency refers to professed principals; and he avows principles which raise him above any particular body of Christians, while yet he deems it his honor to belong to one of them in preference to all others.
But his attachment to his regiment does not make him an enemy to the army of which it is a part. Let every one of us, savs the Apostle, please his neighbor for his good to edification. Why should not th: Author wish to be serviceable to members of other communions, as well as to those of his own?
Dr. Watts, though a firm Pedobaptist, has yet composed and inserted in his excellent book, several hymns adapted to the convictions of those who practice adult baptism by immersion only.
And the late Mr. Newton, though an Episcopalian, made no scruple when de. sired to draw up a plan for a dissenting academy.
“Let us stand in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free. Let not him that eateth, despise him that eateth not; and let not him that eateth not judge him that eateth, for God hath received him. Who art thou that judg. est another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth.
One man esteemeth one day above another, another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it.” Here every thing non-essential is left, where it ought to be left, to individual conviction and candor.
Upon these principles, the Author thinks, a dissenter without superstition may use these forms on these very days ; especially as he is under no compul. sion, and he has nothing to do with the day, but as a season of leisure, and as re minding him of some important truth.
A Christian, however, if he disregards the seasons, must love the subjects connected with them; and at some time or other he may wish more expressly to notice them; and this he can do by means of these forms, with the omission of a few words.
It is comparatively easy to be long and diffuse; but to be select and yet sull; brief and yet comprehensive--this is the trial.
The Author could have composed a single prayer far superior to any of these; but the difficulty lay in the number; and the work must be judged of as a whole.
It is hardly necessary to observe, that with a slight alteration, and the substitution of the singular number for the p-ural, most if these prayers wil serve for the closet as well as the family.
In republishing this last volume of Mr. Jay, the American Editor cannot but hope he has performed an acceptable and useful service. The high sat. isfaction with which other works of the same esteemed author have been ro. ceived in this country, is a sufficient recommendation of the present perfor mance, to secure it general attention. Of its intrinsic, or comparative value, the public will judge, when they shall have given it a faithful perusal. Few alterations have been made in the original work, except where its local character demanded it; and then the subject has been adapted to the circum. stances of our own country, without breaking the Author's connexion, or materially affecting his style. That it might be still more complete, an Appendix, containing several selected and a few original forms of devotion, has been added. It is now commended to the attention of the christian public, as a more complete manual for the use of FAMILIES than bas hitherto been published.
Salem, Yass, Sept. 1824.