Page images
PDF
EPUB

its authorship having been started in the Even-
ing Post some years afterward, it was attrib-
uted by Mr. Bryant to Landor, when Mr. Grant
White, who was then in Boston, wrote to the
Post and claimed its authorship."
* His literary
tendencies soon drew him away from the bar,
and he became a contributor to the New York
Courier and Enquirer, although without any
avowed connection with the paper. His fond-
ness for music, of which he had been from boy-
hood a loving student, led him to write a series
of musical criticisms, which were so brilliant
in style and so full of knowledge that they
attracted attention, abroad as well as at home.
But with a love of concealing his personality
which seems never to have deserted him, he
did not own these writings. He ere long was
suspected to be their author, however, and was
known for some time by the sobriquet of the
"private gentleman of the Courier." He had
He had
now given himself up to the study of literature
and art, and his criticisms on music, painting,
and the drama, commanded such constant and
admiring attention from the public that they
made a literary reputation of themselves. Ă
part of these pages made up his first volume, a
Biographical and Critical Hand-Book of Chris-
tian Art, 1853.

A

in England. Discussion was rife as to their authorship; but so unlike were they to Mr. Grant White's previous writings, that for a long time he was not suspected; and to this day he has never owned them even in their collected form, although it is now well known that he was their author.

During the war he also wrote a series of letters in the columns of the London Spectator, under the signature "A Yankee," which continued through four years. The calm boldness of these letters, their mastery of their subject, and their purity of style, gave them great influence in England, where it was confessed that they did much to restrain the British government from interfering in our affairs,* and caused Mr. Grant Duff, M. P., one of the most distinguished political writers of Great Britain, to say in one of his recent works, that without reading the "Yankee Letters" it was impossible to understand the politics of this country. Again the author kept his own counsel, and it was nearly two years before the authorship, which he has since avowed, was inferred in literary circles.

although some of his views have been opposed by some philological writers.

Among his other works are, his volume upon the Life and Genius of Shakespeare, his Essay upon the Authorship of the Three Parts of Henry VI., 1859, of which Mr. J. R. Lowell has said that it settles that disputed point as far as it can be settled by criticism; and a volume of Poetry, Lyrical, Narrative, and Satirical, of the Civil War; selected and edited,

1866.

His last work, Words and their Uses,† a desultory study of the English language, enters upon a field for which his previous literary Upon the publication of the now notorious labor, particularly his Shakespeare, fully preCollier folio manuscript emendations of Shake-pared him, and has had a marked success, speare, which at first captivated the world, there appeared in Putnam's Magazine† a series of articles directed against the worth and even the asserted antiquity of the emendations. The acumen, learning, and spirited style of these articles compelled general admiration, if not assent. Anonymous at first, they were ere long owned by Mr. Grant White, and were embodied with other matter of the same kind in his Shakespeare's Scholar, published in 1854. The strength and The strength and subtlety of criticism, and the research evinced in this volume, gave him immediately, both in Europe and America, a place in the front rank of English critics and scholars, a position which was afterward confirmed by his critical edition of Shakespeare's Works with Essays and Notes, upon which he was engaged seven years. Meantime he published a volume upon National Hymns,|| which was elicited by the appointment of a committee, of which he was one, in the first year of the civil war, to obtain a National Hymn for the people of the United States. Soon afterward he published anonymously a humorous satire entitled The New Gospel of Peace, T which was the first of a series under the same title, which produced such an effect, and had such an enormous sale, that they became one of the moral forces of the time, and were reprinted

*New York Evening Post, January 18, 1852. October and November, 1853.

Shakespeare's Scholar: being Historical and Critical Studies of his Text, Characters, and Commentators; with an Examination of Mr. Collier's Folio of 1623; pp. 504. 1854.

Plays and Poems: The Plays Edited from the Folio of MDCXXIII, with Various Readings from all the Editions and all the Commentators, Notes, Introductory Remarks, a Historical Sketch of the Text, an Account of the Rise and Progress of the English Drama, a Memoir of the Poet, and an Essay upon his Genius. 12 vols., 1857-65.

National Hymns; How they are Written, and How they are Not Written; a Lyrical and National Study for the Times; October, 1861.

New Gospel of Peace; According to St. Benjamin. In four books. 1863-6.

Mr. White's style is remarkable for purity and clearness, for its union of breadth of view and subtlety in criticism, and for the apparently unconscious ease with which it enlivens the

gravest and dryest subjects with vivacity and humor. A man of society, he is yet reserved in manner, and studiously avoids personal appearance before the public.

**WASHINGTON: PATER PATRIÆ.

High over all whom might or mind made great,
Yielding the conqueror's crown to harder hearts,
Exalted not by politicians' arts,

Yet with a will to meet and master Fate,
And skill to rule a young, divided state,

Greater by what was not than what was done,
Alone on History's height stands Washington;
And teeming Time shall not bring forth his mate.
For only he, of men, on Earth was sent

In all the might of mind's integrity:
Ne'er as in him truth, strength, and wisdom blent:
And that his glory might eternal be,

A boundless country is his monument,
A mighty nation his posterity.

* See, also, article on Mr. White's patriotic services, by Mr. E. P. Whipple, in the Boston Evening Transcript, August 28, 1865.

Words and Their Uses, Past and Present, 1870, a series of articles contributed to the Galaxy; revised edition, 1872.

Memoirs of the Life of William Shakespeare, with an Essay towards the Expression of his Genius, and an Account of the Rise and Progress of the English Drama to the Time of Shakespeare, pp. 425. 1865.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

GOD SAVE THE KING," AND THE MARSEILLAISE
FROM NATIONAL HYMNS.

How widely do the histories of these two hymns differ, and how characteristic is their difference of the two people who have adopted them! The British hymn, like the British constitution, the product of no man and of no time; the origin of its several parts various and uncertain, or seen darkly through the obscurity of the past; its elements the product of different peoples; broached at first in secret, and when brought to light, frowned down as treasonable, heretical, damnable; but at length openly avowed, and gradually growing into favor; modified, curtailed, added to in important points by various hands, yet remaining vitally untouched; at last accepted because it is no longer prudent to refuse to yield it place; and finally insisted upon as the time-honored palladium of British liberty. The Marseillaise, written to order, and in one night, to meet a sudden, imperative demand; struck out at the white heat of unconscious inspiration, perfect in all its parts, totus, teres, atque rotundus; and in six months adopted by the people, the army, and the legislature of the whole nation. The air of the one, simple, solid, vigorous, dignified, grand, the music of common sense and fixed determination ; the words, though poor enough, mingling trust, and prayer, and self-confidence, and respect for whoever is above us, and a readiness to fight stoutly when God and the law are on our side: the other a war cry, a summons to instant battle, warning, appealing, denouncing, fiercely threatening the vengeance of the Furies; having no inspiration but glory, and invoking no god but liberty; beginning in deliberate enthusiasm, and ending in conscious frenzy.

[ocr errors]

How different the service too, to which the two songs have been put! The one used always to sustain, to build up, to perpetuate, to express loyalty and faithful endurance; a song of peace and plethoric festivity. The other, the signal of destruction, the warning note of revolution; the song that rises from the field where the ploughshare turns up petrified abuses to the light of heaven and vengeance stalks between the stilts; the howl of famished men, and the shriek of nursing mothers whose breasts are dry. The one at best a tonic, but mostly sedative in its operation, and harmless at any time: the other from the beginning a stimulant, and to be used on great occasions only, and for great objects. The Girondists sang the first four lines of it, asexcept one who fell before his judges, struck through the heart with his own dagger they turned away from the bloody tribunal which had condemned them to death in the name of the liberty they had done so much to gain. At the battle of Jemappes, at the most perilous hour of that long doubtful day, Dumouriez, finding his right wing almost without officers, and giving way before the fire of the Austrian infantry and a threatened charge of the huzzars, put himself at the head of his battalions and began to sing the Marseillaise hymn, then not many months old; the soldiers joined in the song, their courage rallied, they charged and carried all before them. And in August of the next year at the fête of the inauguration of the constitution (always a fête and an inauguration) when the convention and the delegates from the primary assemblies, including eighty-six doyens — which seems to be French for the oldest inhabitant to represent the eighty-six departments, assembled with a throng of " citizens gene

I rally" in the Place de la Bastille at four o'clock in the morning around a great fountain, called the Fountain of the Regeneration, as soon as the first beams of the sun appeared, they saluted him by singing stanzas to the air of the Marseillaise; and then the President took a cup, poured out before the sun the waters of regeneration, and drank thereof himself, and passed the cup to the oldest inhabitants, and they also drank thereof, in their parochial capacity. These ways are not the ways of our race. Indeed, even if Sir John Cope had begun to sing

God Save the King at Preston-pans, or General Hawley had in like manner lifted up his voice at Falkirk, or General McDowell had favored the

army with the “ Star-Spangled Banner" at Man

assas (always supposing it to be within the com-
pass of his voice), I doubt much whether they
would have produced any change in the fortunes
of these battles; nay, I fear they would have been
greeted only with unseemly merriment. Sir John
Cope's regulars would still have "fled in the
utmost confusion at the first onset "General
Hawley's veterans would have been "broke by
the first volley" and
" and "turned their backs and
fled in the utmost consternation; " and General
McDowell's raw volunteers, after fighting three
hours and a half against an entrenched enemy in
superior force, and driving him two miles be-
fore them, would still have been seized with a
sudden panic and retreated in disgraceful dis-
order to Washington, leaving their enemy so crip-
pled that he could not, even if he dared, pursue
them.

But differing thus entirely in spirit and origin, these celebrated songs have one historical point in common, which is interesting in itself, and full of significance to such folk as say, Go to, let us make a national hymn: - they have both been perverted from their original purpose. The British hymn, made up, as we have seen, of an air from France, and words from Jacobite Scotland, into a song praying for the scattering, the confounding, the frustrating, and the general damnation of the reigning family, with its words altered by this man and the other, and its melody doctored by this musician and its harmony by the other, has come to be the recognized formal expression of loyalty to the very house for whose overthrow it first petitioned. And as to the Marseillaise, the purpose of its author is sadly told in his sad fate. Soon proscribed as a royalist, he fled from France, and took refuge in the Alps. But the echoes of the chord that he so unwittingly had struck pursued him even to the mountain tops of Switzerland. What," said he to a peasant guide in the upper fastnesses of the border range, "is this song that I hear. Allons, enfans de la patrie? "That? That is the Marseillaise." And thus, suffering from the excesses that he had innocently stimulated, he first learned the name which his countrymen had given to the song that he had written.

[ocr errors]

But from the purpose built into its very structure and breathing in its every word, the Marseillaise cannot be perverted. It is a war song, and is only suited to the periods when the liberties of the nation are threatened. Therefore, other national airs are performed on ordinary occasions. Partant pour la Syrie," attributed to Queen Hortense, is, with no special propriety, the recognized French air at present. "God Save the King" has the advantage of being suited to all times and seasons; so while there is a king in Great Britain no other song will take its place.

66

And this will be a very long time; much longer than many people think. For not only is John Bull, as I heard a distinguished British statesman say, "a lord-loving animal;" he is a kingworshipping creature also. He may devote his own soul to perdition, but he devoutly prays for the queen and all the royal family. He delights in the very epithet royal, and unless some of his heartiness is bred out of him, utters it with unctuous relish. He rises in his own respect by dealing with the grocer to her Majesty; and his eye beams complacently upon the crown stamped on his pickle jar. Kingship will never be driven out from that land; it will be solicitously retained while it is gradually robbed of even the semblance of prerogative, until at length there will be somebody called a king there who has less power than a constable. And when at last the shadow of royalty has become so faint that even British eyes can see nothing on the throne but velvet and vacuity, and nothing in the crown but emptiness, when the game of monarchy is played out, and "God Save the King" cannot be sung because there is no king to save, be sure that a new national hymn will not be written. The old air will be preserved; the words will be altered as little as possible, and perverted as much as possible, so that Britons, though they no longer express their "respect for their monarch," can yet give utterance to their "national pride," as nearly as may be in the good old way.

**SHAKESPEARE'S CREATIVE GENIUS.* Shakespeare thus used the skeletons of former life that had drifted down to him upon the stream of time and were cast at his feet, a heap of mere

dead matter. But he clothed them with flesh and blood, and breathed life into their nostrils; and they lived and moved with a life that was individ

ual and self-existent after he had once thrown it

off from his own exuberant intellectual vitality. He made his plays no galleries of portraits of his contemporaries, carefully seeking models through the social scale, from king to beggar. His teeming brain bred lowlier beggars and kinglier kings than all Europe could have furnished as subjects for his portraiture. He found in his own consciousness ideals, the like of which for beauty or deformity neither he nor any other man had ever looked upon. In his heart were the motives, the passions, of all humanity; in his mind, the capability, if not the actuality, of all human thought. Nature, in forming him alone of all the poets, had laid that touch upon his soul which made it akin with the whole world, and which enabled him to live at will throughout all time, among all peoples. Capable thus, in his complete and symmetrical nature, of feeling with and thinking for all mankind, he found in an isolated and momentary phase of his own existence the law which governed the life of those to whom that single phase was their whole sphere. From the germ within himself he produced the perfect individual, as it had been or might have been developed. The eternal laws of human life were his servants by his heaven-bestowed prerogative, and he was yet their instrument. Conformed to them because instinct with them, obedient to, yet swaying them, he used their subtle and unerring powers to work out from seemingly trivial and independent truths the vast problems of humanity; and standing ever

From Life and Genius of Shakespeare, 1865, pp. 288-90.

within the limits of his own experience, he read and reproduced the inner life of those on the loftiest heights or in the lowest depths of being, with the certainty of the physiologist who from the study of his own organization recreates the monsters of the ante-human world, or of the astronomer who, not moving from his narrow study, announced the place, form, movement, and condition of a planet then hid from earthly eyes in the abyss of space.

Shakespeare thus suffered not even a temporary absorption of his personages; he lost not the least consciousness of selfhood, or the creator's power over the clay that he was moulding. He was at no time a murderer at heart because he drew Macbeth, or mad because he made King Lear. We see that, although he thinks with the brain and feels with the soul of each of his personages by turns, he has the power of deliberate introspection during this strange metempsychosis, and of standing outside of his transmuted self, and regarding these forms which his mind takes on as we do; in a word, of being at the same time actor and spectator.

** EDWARD EVERETT HALE,

A PROLIFIC and suggestive writer, and the editor of the Old and New of Boston, was born in that city, April 3, 1822. He is the son of Nathan Hale, LL.D., and of Sarah Preston Hale, a sister of Edward Everett. His father, a nephew of the Captain Nathan Hale executed in New York as a spy by Sir William Howe in 1776, became the proprietor of the Boston Daily Advertiser in 1814. It was "the first daily in New England, the principle of editorial responsibility distinct and for many years the only one, and established from that of individual contributors. Its influence was great. He was a public-spirited citizen, and notably active in establishing a sys

[ocr errors]

tem of railroads in Massachusetts. In 1825 he prepared a map of New England, a standard authority, and three years later a work on the policy of a protective tariff. He was a member

of the club that established the North American Review and the Christian Examiner. He died at Brookline, Mass., February 9, 1863, in his seventy-ninth year.

Edward Everett Hale was graduated at Harvard College in 1839. He was pastor of the Church of the Unity, at Worcester, Massachusetts, from 1846 to 1856; and of the South Congregational Church, Boston, since that time.

He is an active member of the American Antiquarian Society, and has contributed many papers to its publications, as well as to the Christian Examiner, and other leading periodicals. The American edition of Lingard's History of England, in thirteen volumes, was published at Boston under his editorial supervision, in 1853-4.

His original works comprise Margaret Percival in America, written as a sequel to a tale by Rev. William Sewall, 1850; Sketches of Christian History, 1850; Kansas and Nebraska, a sketch of the physical characteristics and political position of those Territories, 1854; and Ninety Days' Worth of Europe.

*Drake's Biographical Dictionary, art. Nathan Hale, p. 395. Allibone's Dictionary of English Literature.

The Man Without a Country, a story having all the verisimilitude of actual fact, which he contributed to the Atlantic Monthly during the war, under the pen-name of Col. Frederick Ingham, won, as it deserved, the popular favor. Like it, his later writings show power of imagination and a definite moral purpose held in view, though not always such an artistic elaboration of their themes. These works comprise: If, Yes, and Perhaps Four Possibilities and Six Exaggerations, with some Bits of Fact, 1868, a series of brilliant magazine articles; and The Ingham Papers, 1869. Sybaris, and Other Homes, 1869, sets out to picture what the homes of laboring men are, what they ought to be, and what they ought not to be. Ten Times One is Ten; or, The Possible Reformation: A Story in Nine Chapters, gives a plausible basis on which to inaugurate the millennial epoch, founded on these four principles of social conduct: "To look up and not down; to look forward and not back; to look out and not in; and, to lend a hand." How to Do It, 1871, purports to be a book of suggestions on talking, reading, writing, society, travel, etc. Six of One by Half a Dozen of the Other, 1872 a social romance, was jointly constructed by three lady writers- Harriet Beecher Stowe, Adeline D. T. Whitney, and Lucretia P. Hale; and three gentlemen Frederick W. Loring, F. B. Perkins, and its projector, E. E. Hale. Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, 1873, a series of stories, with a sketch of the first Christmas celebrated by a king of Italy in Rome, was followed by Ups and Downs, An Every-Day Novel. Mr. Hale is also the editor of Old and New, a literary magazine established by him in 1869.

**THE MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY-FROM IF, YES, AND

PERHAPS.

I suppose that very few casual readers of the New York Herald of August 13th observed, in an obscure corner, among the "Deaths," the announcement,

CC NOLAN. Died, on board U. S. Corvette Levant, Lat. 2° 11' S., Long. 131° W., on the 11th of May, PHILIP NOLAN."

There are

I happened to observe it, because I was stranded at the old Mission-House in Mackinaw, waiting for a Lake Superior steamer which did not choose to come, and I was devouring to the very stubble all the current literature I could get hold of, even down to the deaths and marriages in the Herald. My memory for names and people is good, and the reader will see, as he goes on, that I had reason enough to remember Philip Nolan. hundreds of readers who would have paused at that announcement, if the officer of the Levant who reported it had chosen to make it thus: "Died, May 11th, THE MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY." For it was as "The Man without a Country" that poor Philip Nolan had generally been known by the officers who had him in charge during some fifty years, as, indeed, by all the men who sailed under them. I dare say there is many a man who has taken wine with him once a fortnight, in a three years' cruise, who never knew that his name was "Nolan," or whether the poor wretch had any name at all.

There can now be no possible harm in telling this poor creature's story. Reason enough there

has been till now, ever since Madison's administration went out in 1817, for very strict secrecy, the secrecy of honor itself, among the gentlemen of the navy who have had Nolan in successive charge. And certainly it speaks well for the honor of its members, that to the press this man's esprit de corps of the profession, and the personal story has been wholly unknown, and, I think, to the country at large also. I have reason to think, from some investigations I made in the Naval Archives, when I was attached to the Bureau of Construction, that every official report relating to him was burned when Ross burned the public buildings at Washington. One of the Tuckers, or possibly one of the Watsons, had Nolan in charge at the end of the war; and when, on returning from his cruise, he reported at Washington to one of the Crowninshields,-who was in the Navy Department when he came home, he found that the Department ignored the whole business. Whether they really knew nothing about it, or whether it was a "Non mi ricordo," determined

on as a piece of policy, I do not know. But this I do know, that since 1817, and possibly before, no naval officer has mentioned Nolan in his report of a cruise.

But, as I say, there is no need for secrecy any longer. And now the poor creature is dead, it seems to me worth while to tell a little of his story, by way of showing young Americans of today what it is to be A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY. Philip Nolan was as fine a young officer as there was in the "Legion of the West,' as the Western When division of our army was then called. Aaron Burr made his first dashing expedition down to New Orleans in 1805, at Fort Massac, or somewhere above on the river, he met, as the devil would have it, this gay, dashing, bright young fellow, at some dinner-party, I think. Burr marked him, talked to him, walked with him, took him a day or two's voyage in his flatboat, and, in short, fascinated him. For the next year barrack-life was very tame to poor Nolan. He occasionally availed himself of the permission the great man had given him to write to him. Long, high-worded, stilted letters the poor boy wrote and rewrote and copied. But never a line did he have in reply from the gay deceiver. The other boys in the garrison sneered at him, because he sacrificed in this unrequited affection for a politician the time which they devoted to Monongahela, hazard, and high-low-jack. Bourbon, euchre, and poker were still unknown. But one day Nolan had his revenge. This time Burr came down the river, not as an attorney seeking a place for his office, but as a disguised conqueror. He had defeated I know not how many district-attorneys; he had dined at I know not how many public dinners; he had been heralded in I know not how many Weekly Arguses, and it was rumored that he had an army behind him and an empire before him. It was a great day-his arrival-to poor Nolan. Burr had not been at the fort an hour before he sent for him. That evening he asked Nolan to take him out in his skiff, to show him a cane-brake or a cotton-wood tree, as he said, really to seduce him; and by the time the sail was over, Nolan was enlisted body and soul. From that time, though he did not yet know it, he lived as A MAN WITHOUT A

[blocks in formation]

came, and Jefferson and the House of Virginia of that day undertook to break on the wheel all the possible Clarences of the then House of York, by the great treason-trial at Richmond, some of the lesser fry in that distant Mississippi Valley, which was farther from us than Puget's Sound is to-day, introduced the like novelty on their provincial stage, and, to while away the monotony of the summer at Fort Adams, got up, for spectacles, a string of court-martials on the officers there. One and another of the colonels and majors were tried, and, to fill out the list, little Nolan, against whom, Heaven knows, there was evidence enough, that he was sick of the service, had been willing to be false to it, and would have obeyed any order to march any-whither with any one who would follow him had the order been signed, By command of His Exc. A. Burr." The courts dragged on. The big flies escaped, rightly for all I know. Nolan was proved guilty enough, as I say; yet you and I would never have heard of him, reader, but that, when the president of the court asked him at the close, whether he wished to say anything to show that he had always been faithful to the United States, he cried out, in a fit of frenzy,

[ocr errors]

66

"D-n the United States! I wish I may never hear of the United States again!

I suppose he did not know how the words shocked old Colonel Morgan, who was holding the court. Half the officers who sat in it had served through the Revolution, and their lives, not to say their necks, had been risked for the very idea which he so cavalierly cursed in his madness. He, on his part, had grown up in the West of those days, in the midst of " Spanish Plot," "Orleans Plot," and all the rest. He had been educated on a plantation where the finest company was a Spanish officer or a French merchant from Orleans. His education, such as it was, had been perfected in commercial expeditions to Vera Cruz, and I think he told me his father once hired an Englishman to be a private tutor for a winter on the plantation. He had spent half his youth with an older brother, hunting horses in Texas; and, in a word, to him "United States" was scarcely a reality. Yet he had been fed by "United States" for all the years since he had been in the army. He had sworn on his faith as a Christian to be true to • United States." It was "United States" which gave him the uniform he wore, and the sword by his side. Nay, my poor Nolan, it was only because "United States" had picked you out first as one of her own confidential men of honor that "A. Burr" cared for you a straw more than for the flat-boat men who sailed his ark for him. I do not excuse Nolan; I only explain to the reader why he damned his country, and wished he might never hear her name again.

[ocr errors]

ident, that you never hear the name of the United States again."

Nolan laughed. But nobody else laughed. Old Morgan was too solemn, and the whole room was hushed dead as night for a minute. Even Nolan lost his swagger in a moment. Then Morgan added,

"Mr. Marshal, take the prisoner to Orleans in an armed boat, and deliver him to the naval commander there."

The Marshal gave his orders and the prisoner was taken out of court.

"Mr. Marshal," continued old Morgan, "see that no one mentions the United States to the

gave

He never did hear her name but once again. From that moment, September 23, 1807, till the day he died, May 11, 1863, he never heard her name again. For that half-century and more he was a man without a country.

Old Morgan, as I said, was terribly shocked. If Nolan had compared George Washington to Benedict Arnold, or had cried, "God save King "God save King George," Morgan would not have felt worse. He called the court into his private room, and returned in fifteen minutes, with a face like a sheet,

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

prisoner. Mr. Marshal, make my respects to Lieutenant Mitchell at Orleans, and request him to order that no one shall mention the United States to the prisoner while he is on board ship. You will receive your written orders from the officer on duty here this evening. The court is adjourned without day."

I have always supposed that Colonel Morgan himself took the proceedings of the court to Washington City, and explained them to Mr. Jefferson. Certain it is that the President approved them, certain, that is, if I may believe the men who say they have seen his signature. Before the Nautilus got round from New Orleans to the Northern Atlantic coast with the prisoner on board the sentence had been approved, and he was a man without a country.

The plan then adopted was substantially the same which was necessarily followed ever after. Perhaps it was suggested by the necessity of sending him by water from Fort Adams and Orleans. The Secretary of the Navy -- it must have been the first Crowninshield, though he is a man I do not remember- was requested to put Nolan on board a government vessel bound on a long cruise, and to direct that he should be only so far confined there as to make it certain that he never saw or heard of the country. We had We had few long cruises. then, and the navy was very much out of favor; and as almost all of this story is traditional, as I have explained, I do not know certainly what his first cruise was. But the commander to whom he was intrusted, perhaps it was Tingey or Shaw, though I think it was one of the younger men, we are all old enough now, regulated the etiquette and the precautions of the affair, and according to his scheme they were carried out, I suppose, till Nolan died.

war,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The rule adopted on board the ships on which I have met "the man without a country was, I think, transmitted from the beginning. No mess liked to have him permanently, because his presence cut off all talk of home or of the prospect of return, of politics or letters, of peace or of cut off more than half the talk the men liked to have at sea. But it was always thought too hard that he should never meet the rest of us, except to touch hats, and we finally sank into one system. He was not permitted to talk with the men, unless an officer was by. With officers he had unrestrained intercourse, as far as they and he chose. But he grew shy, though he had favorites: I was one. Then the captain always asked him to dinner on Monday. Every mess in succession took up the invitation in its turn. According to the size of the ship, you had him at your mess more or less often at dinner. His breakfast he ate in his own state-room, - he always had a stateroom, — which was where a sentinel or somebody on the watch could see the door. And whatever

« PreviousContinue »