I.

ROSCOE CONKLING.

Nomination of U. S. Grant.1

Delivered at the Republican Presidential Convention at Chicago,
June 5, 1880.

[The nominees at the Convention were: U. S. Grant, J. G. Blaine, William Windom, John Sherman, G. F. Edmunds, and E. B. Washburne. Throughout the thirty-six ballots the Grant forces remained firm, his vote varying only between 303 and 312. After the thirty-fifth 5 ballot, a combination of the followers of Sherman, Blaine, and Edmunds gave Garfield 399 votes on the thirty-sixth ballot. On the first ballot for a candidate for vice-president, Chester A. Arthur was chosen.]

"When asked what State he hails from,

Our sole reply shall be,

He comes from Appomattox,

And its famous apple-tree."

In obedience to instructions I should never dare to disregard expressing, also, my own firm convictions I rise to propose a nomination with which the country and the Re15 publican party can grandly win. The election before us is to be the Austerlitz of American politics. It will decide, for many years, whether the country shall be Republican or Cossack. The supreme need of the hour is not a candidate who can carry Michigan. All Republican candidates can 20 do that. The need is not of a candidate who is popular in the Territories, because they have no vote. The need is of a candidate who can carry doubtful States. Not the doubtful States of the North alone, but doubtful States of the

1 Reprinted, by permission of Alfred R. Conkling, from Life of Roscoe Conkling, p. 596.

Junction

--

5

South, which we have heard, if I understand it aright, ought
to take little or no part here, because the South has nothing
to give, but everything to receive. No, gentlemen, the need
that presses upon the conscience of this Convention is of a
candidate who can carry doubtful States both North and
South. And believing that he, more surely than any other
man, can carry New York against any opponent, and can
carry not only the North, but several States of the South,
New York is for Ulysses S. Grant. Never defeated in peace
or in war, his name is the most istrious borne by living man. 10
His services attest his greatness, and the country — nay,
the world knows them by heart. His fame was earned
not alone in things written and said, but by the arduous
greatness of things done. And perils and emergencies will
search in vain in the future, as they have searched in vain 15°
in the past, for any other on whom the nation leans with
such confidence and trust. Never having had a policy to
enforce against the will of the people, he never betrayed a
cause or a friend, and the people will never desert nor
betray him. Standing on the highest eminence of human 20
distinction, modest, firm, simple and self-poised, having filled
all lands with his renown, he has seen not only the high-
born and the titled, but the poor and the lowly, in the utter-
most ends of the earth, rise and uncover before him. He
has studied the needs and the defects of many systems of 25
government, and he has returned a better American than
ever, with a wealth of knowledge and experience added to
the hard common-sense (which shone so conspicuously in all
the fierce light that beat upon him during sixteen years, the
most trying, the most portentous, the most perilous in the 30
nation's history.

Vilified and reviled, ruthlessly aspersed by unnumbered presses, not in other lands but in his own, assaults upon him have seasoned and strengthened his hold on the public heart. Calumny's ammunition has all been exploded: the 35 powder has all been burned once: its force is spent: and

the name of Grant will glitter a bright and imperishable star in the diadem of the republic when those that have tried to tarnish that name have mouldered in forgotten graves, and when their memories and their epitaphs have vanished' 5 utterly.

Never elated by success, never depressed by adversity, he has ever, in peace as in war, shown the genius of common sense. The terms he prescribed for Lee's surrender foreshadowed the wisest prophecies and principles of reconIO struction. Victor in the greatest war of modern times, he quickly signalized his aversion to war and his love of peace by an arbitration of internal disputes which stands as the wisest, the most majestic example of its kind in the world's diplomacy. When inflation, at the height of its popularity 15 and frenzy, had swept both Houses of Congress, it was the veto of Grant, which, single and alone, overthrew expansion and cleared the way for specie resumption. To him, immeasurably more than to any other man, is due the fact that every paper dollar is at last as good as gold.

20

25

With him as our leader we shall have no defensive cam

paign. No! We shall have nothing to explain away. We shall have no apologies to make. The shafts and the arrows have all been aimed at him, and they lie broken and harmless at his feet.

Life, liberty and property will find a safeguard in him. When he said of the colored men in Florida, "Wherever I am, they may come also "— when he so said, he meant that, had he the power, the poor dwellers in the cabins of the South should no longer be driven in terror from the homes 30 of their childhood and the graves of their murdered dead. When he refused to see Dennis Kearney in California, he meant that communism, lawlessness, and disorder, although it might stalk high-headed and dictate law to a whole city, would always find a foe in him. He meant that, popular or 35 unpopular, he would hew to the line of right, let the chips fly where they may.

5

His integrity, his common-sense, his courage, his unequalled experience, are the qualities offered to his country. The only argument, the only one that the wit of man or the stress of politics has devised is one that would dumbfounder Solomon, because he thought there was nothing new under the sun. Having tried Grant twice and found him faithful, we are told that we must not, even after an interval of years, trust him again. My countrymen! my countrymen what stultification does not such a fallacy involve ! The American people exclude Jefferson Davis from public trust. Why? 10 why? because he was the arch traitor and would-be destroyer; and now the same people are asked to ostracize Grant and not to trust him. Why? why? I repeat: because he was the arch-preserver of his country, and because, not only in war, but twice as civil magistrate, he gave his high- 15 est, noblest efforts to the republic. Is this an electioneering juggle, or is it hypocrisy's masquerade? There is no field of human activity, responsibility, or reason, in which rational beings object to an agent because he has been weighed in the balance and not found wanting. There is, I say, no depart- 20 ment of human reason in which sane men reject an agent because he has had experience making him exceptionally competent and fit. From the man who shoes your horse to the lawyer who tries your cause, the officer who manages your railway or your mill, the doctor into whose hands you 25 give your life, or the minister who seeks to save your soul, what man do you reject because by his works you have known him and found him faithful and fit? What makes the Presidential office an exception to all things else in the common sense to be applied in selecting its incumbent? 30 Who dares who dares to put fetters on that free choice and judgment which is the birthright of the American people? Can it be said that Grant has used official power and place to perpetuate his term? He has no place, and official power has not been used for him. Without patronage and 35 without emissaries, without committees, without bureaus,

without telegraph wires running from his house to this Convention, or running from his house anywhere else, this man is the candidate whose friends have never threatened to bolt unless this Convention did as they said. He is a Republi5 can who never wavers. He and his friends stand by the creed and the candidate of the Republican party. They hold the rightful rule of the majority as the very essence of their faith, and they mean to uphold that faith against not only the common enemy, but against the charlatans, jay10 hawkers, tramps, and guerillas - the men who deploy between the lines, and forage now on one side and then on the other. This Convention is master of a supreme opportunity. It can name the next President. It can make sure of his election. It can make sure not only of 15 his election, but of his certain and peaceful inauguration. More than all, it can break that power which dominates and mildews the South. It can overthrow an organization whose very existence is a standing protest against progress.

The purpose of the Democratic party is spoils. Its very /20 hope of existence is a solid South. Its success is a menace to order and prosperity. I say this Convention can overIt can dissolve and emancipate a solid South. It can speed the nation in a career of grandeur eclipsing all past achievements.

throw that power.

25 Gentlemen, we have only to listen above the din and look beyond the dust of an hour to behold the Republican party advancing with its ensigns resplendent with illustrious achievements, marching to certain and lasting victory with its greatest Marshal at its head.

Brad Ginjualto Modery Americay Gatory"

pr 3-40.