« PreviousContinue »
which he needs assistance; and therefore much more shall general councils, in order to that end for which they convene, and to which they need assistance, that is, in order to the conservation of the faith, for the doctrinal rules of good life, and all that concerns the essential duty of a Christian, but not in deciding questions to satisfy contentious, or curious, or presumptuous spirits. But now can the bishops so convened be factious,-can they be abused with prejudice, or transported with interests,-can they resist the Holy Ghost,can they extinguish the Spirit,---can they stop their ears, and serve themselves upon the Holy Spirit and the pretence of his assistances; and cease to serve them upon themselves, by captivating their understandings to his dictates, and their wills to his precepts? Is it necessary they should perform any condition ? is there any one duty for them to perform in these assemblies, a duty which they have power to do or not to do? If so, then they may fail of it, and not do their duty: and if the assistance of the Holy Spirit be conditional, then we have no more assurance that they are assisted, than that they do their duty, and do not sin.
2. Now let us suppose what this duty is: certainly, if the gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost;' and all that come to the knowledge of the truth, must come to it by such means which are spiritual and holy dispositions, in order to a holy and spiritual end. They must be • shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace,' that is, they must have peaceable and docible dispositions, nothing with them that is violent and resolute to encounter those gentle and sweet assistances : and the rule they are to follow, is the rule which the Holy Spirit hath consigned to the catholic church, that is, the Holy Scripture, either entirely', or at least for the greater part of the rule: so that now if the bishops be factious and prepossessed with persuasions depending upon interest, it is certain they may judge amiss ; and if they recede from the rule, it is certain they do judge amiss: and this I say upon their grounds who most advance the authority of general councils: for if a general council may err if a Pope confirm it not, then most certainly if in any thing it recede from Scripture, it does also err; because that they are to expect the Pope's confirmation they
r Vide Optat. Milev. 1. 5. adv. Parm. Baldvin. in eundem. et S. August. in ps. 21. Expos. 2.
offer to prove from Scripture: now if the Pope's confirmation be required by authority of Scripture, and that therefore the defailance of it does evacuate the authority of the council, then also are the councils' decrees invalid, if they recede from any other part of Scripture: so that Scripture is the rule they are to follow, and a man would have thought it had been needless to have proved it, but that we are fallen into ages in which no truth is certain, no reason concluding, nor is there any thing that can convince some men. For Stapleton, with extreme boldness against the piety of Christendom, against the public sense of the ancient church, and the practice of all pious assemblies of bishops, affirms the decrees of a council to be binding, “ Etiamsi non confirmetur ne probabili testimonio Scripturarum ;” nay, though it be quite extra Scripturam ;' but all wise and good men have ever said that sense which St. Hilary expressed in these words, ' Quæ extra evangelium sunt, non defendam;" this was it which the good emperor Constantine propounded to the fathers met at Nice; “ Libri Evangelici, oracula apostolorum, et veterum prophetarum clare nos instruunt quid sentiendum in divi
And this is confessed by a sober man of the Roman church itself, the cardinal of Cusa; “ Oportet quod omnia talia quæ legere debent, contineantur in autoritatibus sacrarum Scripturarum“.” Now then all the advantage I shall take from hence, is this, that if the Apostles commended them who examined their sermons by their conformity to the law and the prophets, and the men of Berea were accounted “ noble for searching the Scriptures, whether those things which they taught, were so or no; I suppose it will not be denied, but the councils' decrees may also be tried whether they be conform to Scripture, yea or no; and although no man can take cognizance and judge the decrees of a council ‘pro autoritate publica,' yet pro informatione privata," they may; the authority of a council is not greater than the authority of the apostles, nor their dictates more sacred or authentic. Now then put case a council should recede from Scripture; whether or no were we bound to believe its decrees? I only ask the question: for it were hard to be bound to believe what to our understanding seems contrary to that which we know to be the word of God: but if we may lawfully recede from the councils' decrées, in case they be contrariant to Scripture, it is all that I require in this question. For if they be tied to a rule, then they are to be examined and understood according to the rule, and then we are to give ourselves that liberty of judgment which is requisite to distinguish us from beasts, and to put us into a capacity of reasonable people, following reasonable guides. But however, if it be certain that the councils are to follow Scripture, then if it be notorious that they do recede from Scripture, we are sure we must obey God rather than men, and then we are well enough. For unless we are bound to shut our eyes, and not to look upon the sun, if we may give ourselves liberty to believe what seems most plain, and unless the authority of a council be so great a prejudice as to make us to do violence to our understanding, so as not to disbelieve the decree, because it seems contrary to Scripture, but to believe it agrees with Scripture, though we know not how, therefore because the council hath decreed it,-unless, I say, we be bound in duty to be so obediently blind and sottish, we are sure that there are some councils which are pretended general, that have retired from the public notorious words and sense of Scripture. For what wit of man can reconcile the decree of the thirteenth session of the council of Constance with Scripture, in which session the half communion was decreed, in defi. ance of Scripture, and with a non obstante' to Christ's institution. For in the preface of the decree, Christ's institution and the practice of the primitive church are expressed, and then, with a 'non obstante, communion in one kind is established. Now then suppose the “non obstante' in the form of words relates to the primitive practice, yet sińce Christ's institution was taken notice of in the first words of the decree, and the decree made quite contrary to it, let the non obstante relate whither it will, the decree (not to call it a defiance) is a plain recession from the institution of Christ, and therefore the “non obstante' will refer to that without any sensible error ; and, indeed, for all the excuses to the contrary, the decree was not so discreetly framed, but that, in the very form of words, the defiance and the non obstante too plainly relative to the first words. For what sense can there else be in the first licet ;' licet Christus in utraque
s Relect. controv. 4.q. 1. a. 3.
specie," and “ licet ecclesia primitiva," etc. “ tamen hoc non obstante," etc. the first licet being a relative term, as well as the second licet,' must be bounded with some correspondent. But it matters not much ; let them whom it concerns, enjoy the benefit of all excuses they can imagine, it is certain Christ's institution and the council's sanction are as contrary as light and darkness. - Is it possible for any man to contrive a way to make the decree of the council of Trent, commanding the public offices of the church to be in Latin, friends with the fourteenth chapter of the Corinthians ? It is not amiss to observe how the hyperaspists of that council sweat to answer the allegations of St. Paul; and the wisest
f them do it so extremely poor, that it proclaims to all the world that the strongest man that is, cannot eat iron, or swallow a rock. Now then, would it not be an unspeakable tyranny to all wise persons (who as much hate to have their souls enslaved as their bodies imprisoned), to command them to believe, that these decrees are agreeable to the word of God? Upon whose understanding soever these are imposed, they may at the next session reconcile them to a crime, and make
any sin sacred, or persuade him to believe propositions contradictory to a mathematical demonstration. All the arguments in the world, that can be brought to prove the infallibility of councils, cannot make it so certain that they are infallible, as these two instances do prove infallibly that these were deceived; and if ever we may safely make use of our reason, and consider whether councils have erred or no, we cannot by any reason be more assured, that they have or have not, than we have in these particulars : so that, either our reason is of no manner of use, in the discussion of this question, and the thing itself is not at all to be disputed, or if it be, we are certain that these actually were deceived, and we must never hope for a clearer evidence in any dispute. And if these be, others might have been, if they did as these did, that is, depart from their rule. And it was wisely said of Cusanus, “ Notandum est experimento rerum universale concilium posse deficere*:" The experience of it is notorious, that councils have erred : and all the arguments against experience are but plain sophistry, 8. And therefore I make no scruple to slight the decrees
* Lib.2. c. 14. Concordat. Cathol.
of such councils, wherein the proceedings were as "prejudicate and unreasonable, as in the council wherein Abailardus was condemned, where the presidents having pronounced
Damnamus,' they at the lower end being awaked at the noise, heard the latter part of it, and concurred as far as Mnamus went, and that was as good as Damnamus; for if they had been awake at the pronouncing the whole word, they would have given sentence accordingly. But by thiş means St. Bernard numbered the major part of voices against his adversary Abailardus': and as far as these men did do their duty, the duty of priests, and judges, and wise men ; so we may presume them to be assisted: but no farther, But I am content this (because but a private assembly) shall pass for no instance: but what shall we say of all the Arian councils celebrated with so great fancy, and such numerous assemblies ? we all say that they erred. And it will not be sufficient to say they were not lawful councils; for they were convened by that authority, which all the world knows did at that time convocate councils, and by which (as it is? confessed and is notorious) the first eight generals did meet, that is, by the authority of the emperor all were called, and
and more did come to them, than came to the most famous council of Nice: so that the councils were lawful, and if they did not proceed lawfully, and therefore did err, this is to say, that councils are then not deceived, when they do their duty, when they judge impartially, when they de cline interest, when they follow their rule ; but this says also, that it is not infallibly certain that they will do so; for these did not, and therefore the others may be deceived as well as these were.
But another thing is in the wind; for councils not confirmed by the Pope, have no warrant that they shall not err, and they, not being confirmed, therefore failed. But whether is the Pope's confirmation after the decree or before! It cannot be supposed before ; for there is nothing to be confirmed, till the decree be made, and the article composed. But if it be after, then possibly the Pope's decree may be requisite in solemnity of law, and to make the authority popular, public, and human; but the decree is true or false before the Pope's confirmation, and is not at all altered by the supervening decree, which being postnate to the decree, alters not what y Epist. Abailardi ad Heliss, conjugem. Cusanus, 1. 2. cap. 25. Concord,