 Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest of all moralists. He was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He shewed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling...  The Quarterly Review - Page 4591818Full view - About this book
 | William Hazlitt - 1902 - 516 pages
...himself, and pleads his own cause, as well as if counsel had been assigned him. In one sense, Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest...humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it. One of the most dramatic passages in the present play is the interview between Claudio and his sister,... | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1902 - 504 pages
...pleads his own cause, as well as if counsel had been assigned him. In one sense, Shakespear was no I moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest of all moralists. He I was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taughtr"' what he had learnt from her.... | |
 | William Shakespeare - 1925 - 212 pages
...everything ; his was to show that ' there is some soul of goodness in things evil.' . . . Shakespeare was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it." Hazlitt lays special... | |
 | Norman Hapgood - 1929 - 296 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Ernest Bernbaum - 1930 - 554 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1930 - 428 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Alfred Harbage - 1947 - 266 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1948 - 436 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |
