 Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest of all moralists. He was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He shewed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling...  The Quarterly Review - Page 4591818Full view - About this book
 | William Shakespeare - 1847 - 578 pages
...prrt*en(, and to come,' U in fine contract to the sentimentality of the other characters. Shakspeare " was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taugluwhat he had learnt from her. He showed the creaieet knowledge uf humanity with the greatest fellow... | |
 | William Shakespeare - 1850 - 656 pages
...present, and to come," is in fine contrast to the sentimentality of the other characters. Shakspeare " was a moralist in the same sense in which Nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity, with the greatest fellow feeling for it" Malone supposes... | |
 | William Shakespeare - 1850 - 614 pages
...present, and to come," is in fine contrast to the sentimentality of the other characters. Shakspeare " was a moralist in the same sense in which Nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity, with the greatest fellow feeling for it." Malone supposes... | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1859 - 494 pages
...himself, and pleads his own cause, as well as if counsel had been assigned him. In one sense, Shakspeare was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest...nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. Hshowed the greatest knowledge of humanity, with the greate; fellow-feeling for it. One of the most... | |
 | John Abraham Heraud - 1865 - 548 pages
...sense, indeed, no moralist at all; in another, of all the greatest. " He," says that genial critic, " was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it." In organic structures... | |
 | William Shakespeare - 1871 - 544 pages
...present, and to come,' is in fine contrast to the sentimentality of the other characters. Shakspeare u was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow feeling for it.''* Malone supposes... | |
 | Francis Jacox - 1877 - 512 pages
...nature, in all its shapes, degrees, depressions, and elevations. Hence, if, in one sense, Shakspeare was no moralist at all; in another, he was the greatest of all moralists—a moralist in the sense in which nature is one: he taught what he had learned from her... | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1878 - 560 pages
...himself, and pleads his own cause, as well as if counsel had been assigned him. In one sense, Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest...is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it. One of the most... | |
 | 1818 - 586 pages
...goodness in things evil." — In one sense, Shakspeare was no moralist at all : in another, he wag the greatest of all moralists. He was a moralist in...is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it.' — pp. 322, 323.... | |
 | William Shakespeare - 1905 - 196 pages
...everything ; his was to show that ' there is some soul of goodness in things evil.' . . . Shakespeare was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He showed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it." Hazlitt lays special... | |
| |
